Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Timothy Hay
in Ingram, Wisconsin
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Ingram.
Request Timothy Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Ingram, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 21,599 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 85th percentile among 7,272 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 95th percentile nationally. Rusk County reports 9,692 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Stratford, Wisconsin, 61 miles away with 55,633 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 85th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
881 ac
10 mi
3,460 ac
25 mi
21,599 ac
50 mi
79,482 ac
100 mi
240,353 ac
150 mi
417,951 ac
250 mi
890,576 ac
Within 25 miles21,599mapped acres · 1.719% of radius · 2025
85th percentile among 7,272 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 95th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Ingram · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
97122- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 97122 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7801472f2ab703d99ae98de63e7c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
83.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
86.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,712 headRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,712 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:010e93a098286b6f61b0d34d4def- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
24,174 headRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 24,174 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4d8d551d0690030a265d1647810b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
10,311 headRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 10,311 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:2d4417d85bb3c82ae87b0fc9a6a2- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
363 headRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 363 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a3f6cb71febdbb9a2f51888cae84- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_headRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bb45c37c043a667a57bbea600a50- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
218 headRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 218 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:fb9bfb30798e41f980dd6e2b4530- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
15,317 acresRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 15,317 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:53b02ccdd564aece82ee75e4669b- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
280 farmsRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 280 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6efb707710ea6adf36817df2a01a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acresRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- - acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d4e9e2f9e779a4a1ad10fa29e687- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farmsRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- - farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:093db8caf5f42845f7888ebb717c- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
30,180 tonsRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 30,180 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:53a99af48be7da4f70d94f333f32- Official record
- Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2 tons/acreRusk County · 2022
How calculated
Rusk County · county
Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55107:hay:reported-yield:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- tons/acre
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8b612c06f9e697465ca3e5f0e0c9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Timothy benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation33.7 in
How calculated
BIG FALLS HYDRO, WI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ccb5f86742a58c19ceb74f4b4de3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature42.3 °F
How calculated
BIG FALLS HYDRO, WI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0defa2f80a30052c9b3c58534bce- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance7.8 miles
How calculated
BIG FALLS HYDRO, WI US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Ingram reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9257d906e4f61ff204a012c50512- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:fc8c53d72761a1ceb779ed054434- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percentIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7fc0c845659676281804195c6655- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
16.9 percentIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:85346b10cb563ca437a48431eb57- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 categoryIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:769343bd62dc21c45d22356d19f4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
63.4 0-100Ingram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:72187e5eafbdb5594ad0ae7f7710- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8d131a22c9163026480d2ebc290c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
10 weeksIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:67a219bd9d3ccc358c174684d4cf- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100Ingram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5b4d6d874f541b14e1896e4e8a9a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100Ingram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f67dd8e41ed4ddd4e614ab0b6dd0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
43.4 0-100Ingram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9f2092182507ce0dde53ace96f2a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
34.8 percentIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:188fea996df394a723d7f13a9eed- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
5.9 percentIngram · 2026
How calculated
Ingram · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c19dabe926f4108b34ba10e5de59- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
39.7sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Stratford, Wisconsin60.9 mi55,633 ac972. Timothy Hay in Unity, Wisconsin51.4 mi54,542 ac963. Timothy Hay in Colby, Wisconsin47.7 mi53,797 ac95.14. Timothy Hay in Abbotsford, Wisconsin45.7 mi53,152 ac94.45. Timothy Hay in Fenwood, Wisconsin58.9 mi53,285 ac93.96. Timothy Hay in Curtiss, Wisconsin42.3 mi51,762 ac92.77. Timothy Hay in Spencer, Wisconsin57.7 mi51,901 ac92.18. Timothy Hay in Dorchester, Wisconsin42 mi51,086 ac91.89. Timothy Hay in Edgar, Wisconsin57.8 mi48,853 ac8810. Timothy Hay in Stetsonville, Wisconsin38.3 mi47,873 ac87.6Source hay
Need Timothy Hay in Ingram?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Ingram
Alfalfa Hay in Ingram, WisconsinExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.