Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Ingram, Wisconsin

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Ingram, Wisconsin
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Ingram.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Ingram

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint13,425.5 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth49.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.6 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty56.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal33.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Ingram

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Ingram. The latest 2025 raster shows 13,426 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 15th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 79th percentile nationally. Rusk County reports 5,625 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Unity, Wisconsin, 51 miles away with 92,311 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 15th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

117 ac

10 mi

807 ac

25 mi

13,426 ac

50 mi

83,161 ac

100 mi

378,561 ac

150 mi

823,969 ac

250 mi

1,901,026 ac

Within 25 miles13,426mapped acres · 1.068% of radius · 2025

15th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 79th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Ingram · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 60368
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 60368 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:897db6ee82cd3815ad175050b64c
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

87.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

49.5production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

5,625 acres

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 5,625 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:71edeacaa7cf95e6207459d33948
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

106 farms

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 106 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4ea804d9c11671d2f5e4fd1c58aa
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

- acres

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b9e1864c2adb52b2ddeeed9fed95
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

- farms

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:eb336eed822c810641aca95dd947
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

11,331 tons

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 11,331 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1a0cc6d4c1d3b7c1713138dff273
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

2 tons/acre

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:dff271c9d312fe624729e6a0c9ad
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

2,712 head

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,712 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:010e93a098286b6f61b0d34d4def
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

24,174 head

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 24,174 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4d8d551d0690030a265d1647810b
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

10,311 head

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 10,311 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2d4417d85bb3c82ae87b0fc9a6a2
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

363 head

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 363 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a3f6cb71febdbb9a2f51888cae84
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:bb45c37c043a667a57bbea600a50
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

218 head

Rusk County · 2022

How calculated

Rusk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 55107:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 218 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:fb9bfb30798e41f980dd6e2b4530
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation33.7 in

How calculated

BIG FALLS HYDRO, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ccb5f86742a58c19ceb74f4b4de3
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature42.3 °F

How calculated

BIG FALLS HYDRO, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:0defa2f80a30052c9b3c58534bce
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance7.8 miles

How calculated

BIG FALLS HYDRO, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Ingram reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:9257d906e4f61ff204a012c50512
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:fc8c53d72761a1ceb779ed054434
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7fc0c845659676281804195c6655
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

16.9 percent

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:85346b10cb563ca437a48431eb57
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:769343bd62dc21c45d22356d19f4
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

63.4 0-100

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:72187e5eafbdb5594ad0ae7f7710
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

WORSENING category

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8d131a22c9163026480d2ebc290c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

10 weeks

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:67a219bd9d3ccc358c174684d4cf
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

20 0-100

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:5b4d6d874f541b14e1896e4e8a9a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

20 0-100

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:f67dd8e41ed4ddd4e614ab0b6dd0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

43.4 0-100

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9f2092182507ce0dde53ace96f2a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

34.8 percent

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:188fea996df394a723d7f13a9eed
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

5.9 percent

Ingram · 2026

How calculated

Ingram · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c19dabe926f4108b34ba10e5de59
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.8sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Unity, Wisconsin51.4 mi92,311 ac97.4 2. Alfalfa Hay in Spencer, Wisconsin57.7 mi89,479 ac94.8 3. Alfalfa Hay in Colby, Wisconsin47.7 mi88,748 ac94.7 4. Alfalfa Hay in Abbotsford, Wisconsin45.7 mi85,379 ac92.1 5. Alfalfa Hay in Stratford, Wisconsin60.9 mi83,891 ac90.1 6. Alfalfa Hay in Curtiss, Wisconsin42.3 mi80,194 ac88 7. Alfalfa Hay in Fenwood, Wisconsin58.9 mi78,933 ac86.2 8. Alfalfa Hay in Loyal, Wisconsin55.4 mi77,771 ac85.4 9. Alfalfa Hay in Owen, Wisconsin40.4 mi74,249 ac83.3 10. Alfalfa Hay in Dorchester, Wisconsin42 mi74,133 ac83.1

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Ingram?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Rusk Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Ingram

Barley Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Ingram, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Ingram, Wisconsin

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Ingram?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Ingram

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Ingram, Wisconsin