Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Timothy Hay
in Winner, South Dakota
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Winner.
Request Timothy Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Winner, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 42,095 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 97th percentile among 4,365 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 100th percentile nationally. Tripp County reports 45,004 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Ideal, South Dakota, 12 miles away with 39,832 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 48.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
Winner ranks among the strongest persistent mapped non-alfalfa hay footprints in South Dakota.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2008-30m
- usda-cdl-2009-30m
- usda-cdl-2010-30m
- usda-cdl-2011-30m
- usda-cdl-2012-30m
- usda-cdl-2013-30m
- usda-cdl-2014-30m
- usda-cdl-2015-30m
- usda-cdl-2016-30m
- usda-cdl-2017-30m
- usda-cdl-2018-30m
- usda-cdl-2019-30m
- usda-cdl-2020-30m
- usda-cdl-2021-30m
- usda-cdl-2022-30m
- usda-cdl-2023-30m
- usda-cdl-2024-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
2,524 ac
10 mi
9,842 ac
25 mi
42,095 ac
50 mi
97,210 ac
100 mi
286,657 ac
150 mi
493,146 ac
250 mi
1,270,609 ac
Within 25 miles42,095mapped acres · 3.35% of radius · 2025
97th percentile among 4,365 analyzed South Dakota localities · 100th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Winner · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
189280- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 189280 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1c4274112296b0e397ea1b6b54fe- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
87.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
94.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
56,999 headTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 56,999 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:27b25e1337f4673dd563a8fc7694- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
145,705 headTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 145,705 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8f771908d09d651dcd24e1cc0349- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- headTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- - head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8e4f49d4e55053391ee3b25130af- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
999 headTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 999 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:509b18661fe627352559d12768ec- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_headTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:029666b42de25545a26df69fa530- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
307 headTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 307 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8b4d4c4d6cb0dbde13bb0f47ae4c- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
113,548 acresTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 113,548 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:3cd3f36d908a16a4be9364bd1f83- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
339 farmsTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 339 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:53f84103d8ead27f2be71e52d94a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,860 acresTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1,860 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a92e54524cfa3cb523f4d5dd962d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
21 farmsTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 21 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6c01798997f29748279b504c8f64- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.6 percentTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:47d8881524ab7ca4833bf60b3b11- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
172,801 tonsTripp County · 2022
How calculated
Tripp County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
46123:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 172,801 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:cd9c7ee39e5e6abb550c80ac5983- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Timothy benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation23.2 in
How calculated
WINNER, SD US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d907868f26dfbb2bc868a60b820c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.7 °F
How calculated
WINNER, SD US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:36beed9bf8270db331d5164e2c7c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance1 miles
How calculated
WINNER, SD US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Winner reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:1c439f39a14825f635758ac6ef38- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
48.7 percentWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:73da6c18433aa11ed77ec35af272- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7f4035e6150e127a90a5b3c08061- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:dc46db15df0263b860d007f90672- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 categoryWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c008683aad4ce5c9e1956d314fb3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
29.7 0-100Winner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:d3b6576999b3e1e45ac665232e21- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING categoryWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ee072cf5649aaaead9d3ce52ff76- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
32 weeksWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:15e8a9414c6ccb09e6fff869d8da- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100Winner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:d487542c0ee46e890f9277ace031- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100Winner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c83fe37334dbb14b427230335db7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100Winner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8e69272f2e3809571973a8ad37f6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
63.4 percentWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:033d8c3b9e509277faf6625e34e7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
26.1 percentWinner · 2026
How calculated
Winner · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:2ce60df11f7565452493700b5a12- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
33.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Ideal, South Dakota11.7 mi39,832 ac99.42. Timothy Hay in Hamill, South Dakota17 mi37,944 ac95.63. Timothy Hay in New Witten, South Dakota12.2 mi36,752 ac93.64. Timothy Hay in Midland, South Dakota80.7 mi37,966 ac92.55. Timothy Hay in Murdo, South Dakota55.6 mi37,173 ac92.26. Timothy Hay in Okaton, South Dakota60.9 mi37,042 ac91.77. Timothy Hay in Colome, South Dakota10.7 mi35,564 ac91.48. Timothy Hay in Okreek, South Dakota26.9 mi34,390 ac88.49. Timothy Hay in White Horse, South Dakota37.6 mi33,911 ac8710. Timothy Hay in Antelope, South Dakota39.2 mi33,664 ac86.4Source hay
Need Timothy Hay in Winner?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Winner
Alfalfa Hay in Winner, South DakotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.