Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Winner, South Dakota

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Winner, South Dakota
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Winner.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Winner

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint53,675.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth95.1 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.3 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty33.3 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal23.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Winner

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Winner. The latest 2025 raster shows 53,675 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 98th percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 98th percentile nationally. Tripp County reports 68,544 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Colome, South Dakota, 11 miles away with 59,682 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 48.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplySTRONG

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

Winner ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in South Dakota.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m
usda-cdl-2008-30m
usda-cdl-2009-30m
usda-cdl-2010-30m
usda-cdl-2011-30m
usda-cdl-2012-30m
usda-cdl-2013-30m
usda-cdl-2014-30m
usda-cdl-2015-30m
usda-cdl-2016-30m
usda-cdl-2017-30m
usda-cdl-2018-30m
usda-cdl-2019-30m
usda-cdl-2020-30m
usda-cdl-2021-30m
usda-cdl-2022-30m
usda-cdl-2023-30m
usda-cdl-2024-30m
usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

2,966 ac

10 mi

9,474 ac

25 mi

53,675 ac

50 mi

128,397 ac

100 mi

390,643 ac

150 mi

799,186 ac

250 mi

2,190,392 ac

Within 25 miles53,675mapped acres · 4.271% of radius · 2025

98th percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities · 98th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Winner · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 241351
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 241351 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7aa257e23ee090dad8c7ad7aafc1
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

87.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

95.1production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

68,544 acres

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 68,544 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c499d760d6bb9865f5ebf629ba51
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

287 farms

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 287 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a716013360fe874eb1a86710b6b9
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

1,552 acres

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,552 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2f92e7d275d80bd8015d70ec4449
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

21 farms

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 21 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ae44c72e0589a5e3ae918a9cc8eb
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

2.3 percent

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:542eab7069f4f9230a749ffcbd2b
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

107,823 tons

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 107,823 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:84d537c6c1d77fc8f12ccd4e88e9
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

1.6 tons/acre

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:332d0f8de35c947f9002b6b1da03
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

56,999 head

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 56,999 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:27b25e1337f4673dd563a8fc7694
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

145,705 head

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 145,705 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8f771908d09d651dcd24e1cc0349
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

- head

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8e4f49d4e55053391ee3b25130af
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

999 head

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 999 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:509b18661fe627352559d12768ec
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Tripp County · 2022

How calculated

Tripp County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46123:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:029666b42de25545a26df69fa530
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation23.2 in

How calculated

WINNER, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d907868f26dfbb2bc868a60b820c
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature49.7 °F

How calculated

WINNER, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:36beed9bf8270db331d5164e2c7c
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance1 miles

How calculated

WINNER, SD US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Winner reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1c439f39a14825f635758ac6ef38
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

48.7 percent

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:73da6c18433aa11ed77ec35af272
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7f4035e6150e127a90a5b3c08061
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:dc46db15df0263b860d007f90672
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D0 category

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c008683aad4ce5c9e1956d314fb3
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

29.7 0-100

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d3b6576999b3e1e45ac665232e21
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

IMPROVING category

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ee072cf5649aaaead9d3ce52ff76
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

32 weeks

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:15e8a9414c6ccb09e6fff869d8da
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

60 0-100

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d487542c0ee46e890f9277ace031
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

40 0-100

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c83fe37334dbb14b427230335db7
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

40 0-100

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8e69272f2e3809571973a8ad37f6
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

63.4 percent

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:033d8c3b9e509277faf6625e34e7
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

26.1 percent

Winner · 2026

How calculated

Winner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:2ce60df11f7565452493700b5a12
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

33.3sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Colome, South Dakota10.7 mi59,682 ac99.5 2. Alfalfa Hay in Dallas, South Dakota19.5 mi53,807 ac91.6 3. Alfalfa Hay in Gregory, South Dakota24.1 mi51,690 ac88.8 4. Alfalfa Hay in Marty, South Dakota76.5 mi51,691 ac86.1 5. Alfalfa Hay in Burke, South Dakota31.3 mi48,737 ac84.7 6. Alfalfa Hay in Wagner, South Dakota81.4 mi49,778 ac83.5 7. Alfalfa Hay in Ravinia, South Dakota73.8 mi48,699 ac82.5 8. Alfalfa Hay in Gross, Nebraska71.3 mi47,505 ac81.1 9. Alfalfa Hay in Lynch, Nebraska79.6 mi47,760 ac81 10. Alfalfa Hay in Pickstown, South Dakota70.1 mi47,027 ac80.6

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Winner?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Tripp Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Winner

Barley Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Winner, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Winner, South Dakota

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Winner?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Winner

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Winner, South Dakota