Sorghum crop context
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Walker, Michigan
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Walker.
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Walker, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 603 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 66th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities and the 56th percentile nationally. Kent County reports 2,790 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Canadian Lakes, Michigan, 46 miles away with 1,775 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 66th percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local sorghum crop context footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
8 ac
10 mi
45 ac
25 mi
603 ac
50 mi
2,327 ac
100 mi
12,782 ac
150 mi
31,992 ac
250 mi
67,410 ac
Within 25 miles603mapped acres · 0.048% of radius · 2025
66th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities · 56th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Walker · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
2710- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2710 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:61fa6cdcd2d272b920c9c4d4d8ad- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
70.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,267 headKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,267 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:1e4cfe3711e6c142a685922b0479- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
21,803 headKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 21,803 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:cdfba558f97bd3cbe7f4d34de607- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
9,034 headKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 9,034 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b1f9001c632dbdc8966dcce1a32a- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,527 headKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1,527 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8e5873c2fd45b4262ca3f4a343f9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_headKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bbb6c92dbca73a4b5b103552d878- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
241 headKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 241 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a8cd239cc6074676fb0deb0a1a1e- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
13,389 acresKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 13,389 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:673f1ac4515093a214ef076e3877- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
353 farmsKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 353 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f9667d393ecdfce560d668b89021- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
436 acresKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 436 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f305377e110920aae9e9dcbb066d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
10 farmsKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 10 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7fbac15f33993e5231a14ada3604- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3.3 percentKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0b82d4ee2dc4df070ae4f6e8e736- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
36,267 tonsKent County · 2022
How calculated
Kent County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26081:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 36,267 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7ac8ad63a8c77528678db1800ef7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation39.6 in
How calculated
E GRAND RAPIDS, MI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a5f1892135d9e53f80c4fb14bb71- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature48 °F
How calculated
E GRAND RAPIDS, MI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:fafabdef449d07c184d3a51007be- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance8.3 miles
How calculated
E GRAND RAPIDS, MI US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Walker reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:1a6a7916c3f657ef187c8e748ba2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percentWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9012e45b6367f18e5448b989982f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:15a2f4974e473178992f78424346- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a19b69ed62fe38bd1b884101297a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE categoryWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:2f4584f158888909c97bb7e2ca7e- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
9.6 0-100Walker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:6604053686a97dbf7a95f32b31c1- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING categoryWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c7a97b847bceb810bf94d03df539- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
6 weeksWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:0490a42ef70103cd3bfdcb93c53f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Walker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b2d22ab5819a67f96f7e3280831f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Walker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:3bcdf4151b14bfdcc67f20c4689d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100Walker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ab7ed17d1aee8d831bf01db2f515- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
20.6 percentWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a986ade88b60ac84c0a93bce4d99- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.6 percentWalker · 2026
How calculated
Walker · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8b274449b6a4ac0654c8944266d0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
46.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Canadian Lakes, Michigan46.3 mi1,775 ac97.72. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Edmore, Michigan46 mi1,650 ac92.43. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Stanton, Michigan39.8 mi1,518 ac87.14. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in McBride, Michigan43.5 mi1,521 ac87.15. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Crystal, Michigan45.4 mi1,503 ac86.26. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Lakeview, Michigan39.5 mi1,487 ac85.87. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Breedsville, Michigan47.4 mi1,469 ac84.78. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Sheridan, Michigan37.2 mi1,407 ac82.69. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Stanwood, Michigan43.2 mi1,346 ac79.710. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Morley, Michigan37.5 mi1,198 ac73.7Source hay
Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Walker?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Walker
Alfalfa Hay in Walker, MichiganExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.