Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Walker, Michigan

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Walker, Michigan
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Walker.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Walker

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint30,308.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth87.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence92.1 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty39.5 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal39.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Walker

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Walker. The latest 2025 raster shows 30,308 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 81st percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities and the 93rd percentile nationally. Kent County reports 10,599 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Crystal, Michigan, 45 miles away with 53,233 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplySTRONG

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 81st percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

568 ac

10 mi

2,932 ac

25 mi

30,308 ac

50 mi

109,198 ac

100 mi

310,960 ac

150 mi

791,634 ac

250 mi

1,726,776 ac

Within 25 miles30,308mapped acres · 2.412% of radius · 2025

81th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities · 93th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Walker · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 136282
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 136282 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:dbaa3b67f9d60a6d30680f643062
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

92.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

87.2production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

10,599 acres

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 10,599 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ed29c25aa22e10f9341241bf1061
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

272 farms

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 272 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a5dff1cd858818a5eee5a002cae4
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

436 acres

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 436 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:30d1d836925b1b9c47fb512e9d4c
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

10 farms

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 10 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:68d897daef458b16a4201bf7bf3f
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

4.1 percent

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3ca76a2b8192cbfedb35eb26158a
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

32,011 tons

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 32,011 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:65ea3c7357a5d920a8ead6cbfa1f
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

3 tons/acre

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2ef042c364b282713a4b5cbe5830
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

2,267 head

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,267 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1e4cfe3711e6c142a685922b0479
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

21,803 head

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 21,803 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:cdfba558f97bd3cbe7f4d34de607
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

9,034 head

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 9,034 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b1f9001c632dbdc8966dcce1a32a
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

1,527 head

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,527 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8e5873c2fd45b4262ca3f4a343f9
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Kent County · 2022

How calculated

Kent County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 26081:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:bbb6c92dbca73a4b5b103552d878
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation39.6 in

How calculated

E GRAND RAPIDS, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a5f1892135d9e53f80c4fb14bb71
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature48 °F

How calculated

E GRAND RAPIDS, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:fafabdef449d07c184d3a51007be
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance8.3 miles

How calculated

E GRAND RAPIDS, MI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Walker reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1a6a7916c3f657ef187c8e748ba2
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9012e45b6367f18e5448b989982f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:15a2f4974e473178992f78424346
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:a19b69ed62fe38bd1b884101297a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

NONE category

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:2f4584f158888909c97bb7e2ca7e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

9.6 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:6604053686a97dbf7a95f32b31c1
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

IMPROVING category

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c7a97b847bceb810bf94d03df539
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

6 weeks

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0490a42ef70103cd3bfdcb93c53f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

0 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:b2d22ab5819a67f96f7e3280831f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

0 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3bcdf4151b14bfdcc67f20c4689d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

20 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ab7ed17d1aee8d831bf01db2f515
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

20.6 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:a986ade88b60ac84c0a93bce4d99
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

0.6 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8b274449b6a4ac0654c8944266d0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

39.5sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Crystal, Michigan45.4 mi53,233 ac97.7 2. Alfalfa Hay in Sheridan, Michigan37.2 mi49,097 ac92.3 3. Alfalfa Hay in Palo, Michigan39.7 mi48,500 ac91.3 4. Alfalfa Hay in Hubbardston, Michigan46.6 mi47,487 ac89.6 5. Alfalfa Hay in Muir, Michigan41.5 mi46,572 ac88.5 6. Alfalfa Hay in Lyons, Michigan41.1 mi46,095 ac87.9 7. Alfalfa Hay in McBride, Michigan43.5 mi45,826 ac87.4 8. Alfalfa Hay in Stanton, Michigan39.8 mi45,651 ac87.3 9. Alfalfa Hay in Edmore, Michigan46 mi45,565 ac86.9 10. Alfalfa Hay in Pewamo, Michigan45.9 mi45,214 ac86.4

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Walker?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Kent Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Walker

Barley Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Walker, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Walker, Michigan

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Walker?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Walker

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Walker, Michigan