Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Superior, Montana

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Superior, Montana
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Superior.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Superior

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint2,943.6 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth46.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence90.2 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty56.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal16.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Superior

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Superior. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,944 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 8th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 53rd percentile nationally. Mineral County reports 1,527 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Old Agency, Montana, 30 miles away with 34,989 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 0.2% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 8th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

44 ac

10 mi

224 ac

25 mi

2,944 ac

50 mi

42,637 ac

100 mi

98,153 ac

150 mi

291,058 ac

250 mi

1,172,944 ac

Within 25 miles2,944mapped acres · 0.234% of radius · 2025

8th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities · 53th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Superior · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 13236
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 13236 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9f58174263fdcbde71e1f888f089
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

90.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.5production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

1,527 acres

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,527 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:01f22ab57f50be6cdd2f0b60cc76
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

23 farms

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 23 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4216b6a247b3335e9ad7bdae9512
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

(D) acres

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ef0a7eba316c9bd37f3ebd36a231
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

13 farms

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 13 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ecab5e09c640800a57500719766d
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

1,573 tons

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,573 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:cfc19f6f94054ad4a121be512efe
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

1 tons/acre

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a74dc8d1d67a13440a93d87900bd
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

240 head

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 240 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:00ae7f24a6eef962041fe8b8f535
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

327 head

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 327 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:46a65eef3056d5338b07c70a885a
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

- head

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f461bf0c7f2f82bc1115ab0bf96f
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

353 head

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 353 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:18284d6b60f5e59f001f893af57c
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

2.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b729e1a3f35f2eff5b45495f2a44
Official record: Open source ↗

AcresHISTORICAL

1,898 acres

Mineral County · 2022

How calculated

Mineral County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30061:hay_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,898 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f3ad75b29f981c442a1413f3be0a
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation16.4 in

How calculated

SUPERIOR, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1acc659ab6487acbc3052bbb323c
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature47.7 °F

How calculated

SUPERIOR, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:afffe0d28f9e0d3faca0fefd8278
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance0.5 miles

How calculated

SUPERIOR, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Superior reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1114479683565525dad235beb85f
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

46.1 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:380e6587b50889aafc288053605f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0.2 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:05e195f81290653e0dc25f8b43d7
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:19916a4e99ec566b703d85344270
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D0 category

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:419781cd8aa40f3296143375623f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

29.3 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d3fd5110537ac6c3f8cd94e51a94
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

WORSENING category

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:bc67658445d5d92d3a944d06ad37
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

15 weeks

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:da2146a0880830af10167353e90c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

4.3 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4d3a3beced595fdf9bd428f1f744
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

16.7 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4b27c447e4362e40b3b0e17dc84c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

11.2 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:fc9a6afddb2e9dd964f73a06fc8e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

32.2 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:86c3c070f7d18eede3b2c42d0b3b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

26 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:af44a6e3608dbfd173f75c563a83
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.8sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Old Agency, Montana29.7 mi34,989 ac98.5 2. Alfalfa Hay in Sčilíp, Montana26.8 mi34,846 ac98.4 3. Alfalfa Hay in Charlo, Montana38.2 mi34,942 ac98 4. Alfalfa Hay in Ronan, Montana44 mi32,753 ac93 5. Alfalfa Hay in Pablo, Montana46.7 mi32,776 ac92.9 6. Alfalfa Hay in Ravalli, Montana35.1 mi32,426 ac92.8 7. Alfalfa Hay in Kerr, Montana47.3 mi32,573 ac92.5 8. Alfalfa Hay in St. Ignatius, Montana38.7 mi32,301 ac92.3 9. Alfalfa Hay in Kicking Horse, Montana43.5 mi32,147 ac91.7 10. Alfalfa Hay in Polson, Montana49.2 mi31,307 ac89.6

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Superior?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Mineral Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Superior

Barley Hay in Superior, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Superior, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Superior, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Superior, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Superior, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Superior, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 69 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Superior, Montana

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Superior?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Superior

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Superior, Montana