HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Sčilíp, Montana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Sčilíp.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint34,846.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth85.3 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence91.4 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty36.9 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal16.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Sčilíp
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Sčilíp. The latest 2025 raster shows 34,846 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 78th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 95th percentile nationally. Sanders County reports 13,733 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Old Agency, Montana, 3 miles away with 34,989 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 2.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 78th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles34,846mapped acres · 2.773% of radius · 2025

78th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities · 95th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Sčilíp · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
156687
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
156687 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3628eff13fd3b7076a578c8e5606
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

91.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 55,041 acres · 76th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2009: 55,772 acres · 80th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2010: 77,074 acres · 96th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2011: 84,537 acres · 97th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2012: 79,613 acres · 97th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2013: 72,779 acres · 96th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2014: 112,881 acres · 94th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2015: 84,938 acres · 94th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2016: 97,325 acres · 95th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2017: 92,643 acres · 94th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2018: 89,072 acres · 88th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2019: 89,762 acres · 89th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2020: 81,858 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 97th national percentile2021: 87,872 acres · 86th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2022: 84,595 acres · 84th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2023: 87,336 acres · 87th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2024: 41,449 acres · 89th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2025: 34,846 acres · 78th regional percentile · 95th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

85.3production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
13,733 acres

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,733 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4915b6ae301e2275dcb9f124a7bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
104 farms

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
104 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d06243cf073ae619cd13df672635
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
8,103 acres

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,103 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f1e294f7a090aa244b71aeabf735
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
76 farms

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
76 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:925e630392f3db20fb83b4c0de1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
59 percent

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6a11b681e2257e53f4aa968b5b56
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
22,714 tons

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
22,714 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7a91e61e12cccabcada669b0b51e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.7 tons/acre

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f46527164282f90ab14a6a872c78
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
8,844 head

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,844 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:770bda1184284257853002a43b89
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
12,048 head

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,048 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7d56973d6b14d5f24c91843cfb60
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
14 head

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc504b915ac5d4de02f12b7bfbf3
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
965 head

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
965 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8a916666cb2828f70afa5eef267f
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Sanders County · 2022

How calculated

Sanders County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30089:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:70eacc95da44f41daf23982c37f2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation16.7 in
How calculated

SAINT IGNATIUS, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df58ad2367e5e5b7c381810659d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.7 °F
How calculated

SAINT IGNATIUS, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c47e4873a66989df26002bd0623
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance12.3 miles
How calculated

SAINT IGNATIUS, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Sčilíp reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:83e31e6f13fbf0172c97f282780c
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
87.4 percent

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:18d258bad071f37d92f287e875f8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
2.3 percent

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:365f26a4e7683965f05219edce67
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4886586bb1c78c601bf6eb2324df
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c63aaa5974a527ec171d7dc4845c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
37.9 0-100

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:714224400d0c4a3c77c5ae672be1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ea3c3834847bce5f295e856e1b40
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
15 weeks

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a30dfc42a087c533c224af7de2fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
5.7 0-100

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:483a943210fc2e1b1dd304f26358
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
19.8 0-100

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:483fb7875abd18db47aee31dbfe3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
21.3 0-100

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0c1fe8cf5e678ef637cf55b06e3a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
33.6 percent

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bb5a66b55bd1acad55b91c6446c8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
21.9 percent

Sčilíp · 2026

How calculated

Sčilíp · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5c974d790efb8cfecd7741dfee89
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

36.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Old Agency, Montana3 mi34,989 ac99.92. Alfalfa Hay in Charlo, Montana12.3 mi34,942 ac99.33. Alfalfa Hay in Ronan, Montana18.9 mi32,753 ac94.34. Alfalfa Hay in Pablo, Montana23.1 mi32,776 ac94.15. Alfalfa Hay in Ravalli, Montana9.5 mi32,426 ac946. Alfalfa Hay in St. Ignatius, Montana12.4 mi32,301 ac93.67. Alfalfa Hay in Kerr, Montana26.1 mi32,573 ac93.58. Alfalfa Hay in Kicking Horse, Montana17.2 mi32,147 ac93.19. Alfalfa Hay in Polson, Montana27.6 mi31,307 ac90.710. Alfalfa Hay in Turtle Lake, Montana27.5 mi31,179 ac90.5
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Sčilíp?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Sanders Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Sčilíp

Barley Hay in Sčilíp, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Sčilíp, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Sčilíp, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Sčilíp, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Sčilíp, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Sčilíp, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.