Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Burns, Wyoming

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Burns.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint11,730.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth80.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence78.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty44.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal15.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Burns, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,731 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 76th percentile among 1,845 analyzed Wyoming localities and the 79th percentile nationally. Laramie County reports 14,419 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Gilcrest, Colorado, 66 miles away with 34,300 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 93.4% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 76th percentile among analyzed Wyoming localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

78.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 4,652 acres · 26th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2009: 20,608 acres · 60th regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2010: 55,638 acres · 80th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2011: 2,596 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 49th national percentile2012: 3,243 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 46th national percentile2013: 80,563 acres · 99th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2014: 61,627 acres · 96th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2015: 48,403 acres · 90th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2016: 47,793 acres · 90th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2017: 37,037 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 75th national percentile2018: 64,627 acres · 91st regional percentile · 88th national percentile2019: 56,371 acres · 87th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2020: 55,406 acres · 84th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2021: 63,965 acres · 88th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2022: 63,109 acres · 86th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2023: 64,910 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2024: 1,017 acres · 47th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2025: 11,731 acres · 76th regional percentile · 79th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

80.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05110b4c6d298bbb25ad77531bc6
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
81,047 head

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
81,047 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:452960c138cbfa28ff83b90f8497
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:49a84576f247b295aa7bd502c0dc
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,887 head

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,887 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:53745964c17c2628f586d3197179
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2904b14394d226e9af0ea10ab97b
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
357 head

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
357 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:26783b202e0323074c41a0e7b5bf
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
32,580 acres

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
32,580 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c2d59f9f8a1d0bb40ddd7acfa36b
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
153 farms

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
153 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9afb8b41937b212f468e440d5f97
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
21,161 acres

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
21,161 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:377f18559093e7bcebecd7cdd5ad
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
105 farms

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
105 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c81ea91649f75c1bb0c6d7176df
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
65 percent

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eea0381604b84c772cb3afbea833
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
70,220 tons

Laramie County · 2022

How calculated

Laramie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56021:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
70,220 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:79edcfe688cd4401c61c6d033ea4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation15.3 in
How calculated

CARPENTER 3N, WY US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:929d8122145306fbdfa14e95eb53
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature46.9 °F
How calculated

CARPENTER 3N, WY US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d19438baac2e6f5f89c71a9ee0ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.4 miles
How calculated

CARPENTER 3N, WY US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Burns reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e572cbabdb6d9b897435085661a9
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:703c0485b9cd2fd34e78f9f93253
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
93.4 percent

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c1ab56845bd4afbada5533a13e42
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
47.3 percent

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:258d3cd20b994783344c5a42ffe1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a887a572f63c0502b525791a242d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
68.1 0-100

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:30f494c85956fbab21de1c5f9730
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6bee9bfade87818077399066199a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
40 weeks

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a18307571ea29b5286a56d8603cb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
69.1 0-100

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1ed4bc2599938f7da4321c66d4eb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.6 0-100

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ddd2f4be1b4b7d349513e292e31e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
70.2 0-100

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6d42d85b809316f13f8ac9f800ea
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
73.2 percent

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:48eff23667a5ee703f0eb5d7b2c1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
58 percent

Burns · 2026

How calculated

Burns · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1d5517dd105cb3bb30285c881654
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

44.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Burns?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.