HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in De Soto, Wisconsin

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving De Soto.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint8,779.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth47.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence73.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty57 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal38.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near De Soto
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around De Soto, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 8,779 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 19th percentile among 7,272 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 67th percentile nationally. Vernon County reports 6,684 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Muscoda, Wisconsin, 42 miles away with 15,495 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 19th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles8,779mapped acres · 0.699% of radius · 2025

19th percentile among 7,272 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 67th percentile nationally.

How calculated

De Soto · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
39476
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
39476 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3a3973e5acaa958baf893c11a2b1
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

73.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 46 acres · 0th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2009: 440 acres · 0th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2010: 2,032 acres · 1st regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2011: 3,866 acres · 91st regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2012: 2,597 acres · 13th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2013: 2,246 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 30th national percentile2014: 3,295 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2015: 1,095 acres · 1st regional percentile · 21st national percentile2016: 1,648 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 24th national percentile2017: 1,689 acres · 5th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2018: 3,186 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 24th national percentile2019: 5,749 acres · 20th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2020: 7,908 acres · 25th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2021: 5,817 acres · 25th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2022: 5,546 acres · 19th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2023: 4,261 acres · 6th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2024: 13 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2025: 8,779 acres · 19th regional percentile · 67th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

47.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
10,371 head

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,371 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2c8c174578b53e4458a8d3191073
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
76,485 head

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
76,485 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3f8df481db90999fb4a2fcba49be
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
24,607 head

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
24,607 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb68f23f45e13d562cd2b20f44e3
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
3,252 head

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,252 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:24136f7b45b5b840d1b5d358b982
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cb0540bd38a928f6b2e1eb8f96d9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,397 head

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,397 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7cc3ad96fb50274f08b3dd267ceb
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
42,605 acres

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,605 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:26822ac0f495384e5cf081284c33
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
1,091 farms

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,091 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:849b8007579352ab5bb217a36df8
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
83 acres

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
83 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:23d7a435cbdabadb4d5ca9640790
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
6 farms

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d352c1ffc522b708b83f690359de
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.2 percent

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aaa6796f7513788f4415cd9f8b61
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
110,700 tons

Vernon County · 2022

How calculated

Vernon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55123:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
110,700 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:171d141ce3c6ac5beb2d1ac674af
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation38.4 in
How calculated

GENOA DAM 8, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ca2d943160ecd349a33f6169a54
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature48.5 °F
How calculated

GENOA DAM 8, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c01f63cb67becd77c7c7e3457f21
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.9 miles
How calculated

GENOA DAM 8, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from De Soto reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1a962c8c51636bc3e9ec57aa5ad4
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:22b830fd934c4c4356596eb26908
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0aef182376bc6cd6d7d77e903909
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4f4d13657761ee81025ca83658d8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf357b023ce2ebfd48a43a50f620
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
19.6 0-100

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b7ed2127fcb58130c7bef20bf489
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:36eced6a4e58641db19975426d68
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2a42c0affd5524add2929b130a38
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
25.2 0-100

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d6f57550433766a7c5dfa9ae8a28
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:badf6b95ea81e746834d88568e43
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
3.1 0-100

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5fa470fd3f8e76574808505ffbdc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
1.2 percent

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:094247e7aeacdd4d927c9e9a59ed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

De Soto · 2026

How calculated

De Soto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:81d52ae05e02849bbf4561714bf1
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Muscoda, Wisconsin41.9 mi15,495 ac97.92. Timothy Hay in Richland Center, Wisconsin41.3 mi14,925 ac95.23. Timothy Hay in Boaz, Wisconsin34.3 mi14,792 ac94.94. Timothy Hay in West Union, Iowa44.9 mi14,775 ac94.35. Timothy Hay in Elgin, Iowa39.5 mi14,282 ac92.26. Timothy Hay in Blue River, Wisconsin35.7 mi14,089 ac91.47. Timothy Hay in Clermont, Iowa37.5 mi13,891 ac90.48. Timothy Hay in Elkader, Iowa40.8 mi13,935 ac90.49. Timothy Hay in St. Lucas, Iowa44.8 mi13,797 ac89.510. Timothy Hay in St. Olaf, Iowa36 mi13,213 ac87.2
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in De Soto?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Vernon CountycountyTimothy Hay markets in Crawford Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in De Soto

Alfalfa Hay in De Soto, WisconsinExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in De Soto, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in De Soto, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in De Soto, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in De Soto, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in De Soto, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 84 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.