Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Hillsboro, West Virginia

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Hillsboro.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint8,321.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth67.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence82.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty47.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Hillsboro, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 8,321 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 51st percentile among 3,951 analyzed West Virginia localities and the 64th percentile nationally. Pocahontas County reports 10,198 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Alderson, West Virginia, 37 miles away with 23,435 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 51st percentile among analyzed West Virginia localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

82.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 47,502 acres · 85th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2009: 33,314 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2010: 16,491 acres · 44th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2011: 15,863 acres · 45th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2012: 13,218 acres · 36th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2013: 31,931 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 78th national percentile2014: 41,794 acres · 77th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2015: 54,365 acres · 87th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2016: 54,159 acres · 85th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2017: 55,657 acres · 74th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2018: 56,671 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 84th national percentile2019: 60,703 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 87th national percentile2020: 60,165 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 86th national percentile2021: 50,527 acres · 76th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2022: 49,525 acres · 74th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2023: 47,850 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2024: 446 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 56th national percentile2025: 8,321 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 64th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

67.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
6,026 head

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,026 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de14881653a6212a40923c6c0fbc
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,326 head

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,326 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c956c2408f3a9c130e1d45251bb9
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
7 head

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2cedb3564f03604ac13a5dad29b0
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
357 head

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
357 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d3dfc78456818cc5e61e7a64b24d
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:133e3689d78ac2fba1af987574b7
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
148 head

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
148 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:334ad2cfc51fd497f9d8db5a96b2
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
11,302 acres

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,302 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8129ca99ad070b356c0b23ab663
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
245 farms

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
245 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ebcb76bc5281843ff7a7d5d2a41
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:08bb5983517f56ba8aa22b0e31c3
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
2 farms

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a93cab6cfe64baff98466d61b75d
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
20,332 tons

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,332 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:764982de11a35c6c6a93f9cc8c87
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.8 tons/acre

Pocahontas County · 2022

How calculated

Pocahontas County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
54075:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:90ab56d679dc00cfe5269af3b5c9
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.8 in
How calculated

BUCKEYE, WV US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6be9386774260d0fa3bfadcba555
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50 °F
How calculated

BUCKEYE, WV US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5a2068a7a108e0bb515c120bbb0
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.4 miles
How calculated

BUCKEYE, WV US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hillsboro reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8e1d30db139213261ecf3369801a
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:73d2567834c6e0504e93822f6865
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:871644f35ddc6aa8658d8625c15f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e32f3114884fc1affc4dce1021f5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:38aaea1f2c8e2196f6f0ae4dda2c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0.2 0-100

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fd7ae04f5f3e982526565df31167
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:866ea139f5292b79d73e2e14e225
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
11 weeks

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9d81be6e8ec1deb012e64fa72569
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.2 0-100

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:37f47b5001812534fdc104830269
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
3.2 0-100

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:67480ea7970fb812af54c3880377
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
18.7 0-100

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e46797dd2dbc5999864fb10b4cb6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
41.6 percent

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d77b33d4af40cb1ff7b506e734f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
24.8 percent

Hillsboro · 2026

How calculated

Hillsboro · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:99d06b244e2a65d7
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:80314d4f8f4fc61bfc4356d62a91
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

47.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Hillsboro?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.