Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Grand Mound, Washington

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Grand Mound.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,103.5 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth48.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty55.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal41.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Grand Mound, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,104 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 26th percentile among 5,751 analyzed Washington localities and the 14th percentile nationally. Thurston County reports 6,663 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Skamokawa Valley, Washington, 38 miles away with 3,005 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 26th percentile among analyzed Washington localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 6,127 acres · 75th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2009: 3,288 acres · 56th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2010: 1,023 acres · 51st regional percentile · 35th national percentile2011: 13,169 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 67th national percentile2012: 1,683 acres · 54th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2013: 1,604 acres · 54th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2014: 71 acres · 31st regional percentile · 9th national percentile2015: 1,394 acres · 44th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2016: 335 acres · 31st regional percentile · 11th national percentile2017: 198 acres · 27th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2018: 1,677 acres · 40th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2019: 1,908 acres · 39th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2020: 2,842 acres · 41st regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2021: 2,277 acres · 44th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2022: 1,730 acres · 39th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2023: 2,433 acres · 44th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2024: 435 acres · 47th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2025: 1,104 acres · 26th regional percentile · 14th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

48.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,196 head

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,196 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e0b9b8c121e8b343d75516c3c2f6
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
18,594 head

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,594 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:06fae9fbb81a873996b55bb7754f
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
4,969 head

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,969 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6bac178725226289e631c5c3afbf
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,985 head

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,985 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1e5133cf289d74b4b5fac6e9d51
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dc0b88b16df83d8b4de494063aa5
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
421 head

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
421 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e6bbc1881f699b2586e73d1e4438
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
7,081 acres

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,081 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:039f993e0f87e6c047b431ced013
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
228 farms

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
228 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5632ae9953bb03b18e872ff156f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,290 acres

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,290 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aef1e5147b68ec0754004dee460a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
42 farms

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac33c472f2021e46e53c56614ddb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
18.2 percent

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c86e40e80f61f8944cee887cf08
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
14,422 tons

Thurston County · 2022

How calculated

Thurston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53067:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,422 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2464a325fa8e78b30dcf8bd09cd4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation41.6 in
How calculated

CENTRALIA, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8d7f891d73cae7602070ef45d8f2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.5 °F
How calculated

CENTRALIA, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1a303bbf1441f63a25a0a5b01591
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.2 miles
How calculated

CENTRALIA, WA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Grand Mound reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:10f8b4837b87898bfe925b7ea0b9
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ee332c297f125d1fe2c6e1d2be7c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc242df67a706bb69e932c75b90a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1840c12911793542967a8b14fc04
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b1024c6fb76640b7c25a9ccf30d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
2 0-100

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:25842e09022af4f9b6ab52b9b799
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ca4aef45d0c6ccee0f9f068f45f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
15 weeks

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0b1978139b3d2ebd883fed10c37c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:51f6174f726c013a1f99d688edad
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8177946e69c678c4ca4b285588bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
2 0-100

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:37fe8f5091a3b6eb4d46fd255244
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
29.3 percent

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb01bccd64ff8445b9e53d03690d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
5.1 percent

Grand Mound · 2026

How calculated

Grand Mound · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b3225f0430b6363ddfac10ac253e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

55.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Grand Mound?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.