Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Wartrace, Tennessee

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Wartrace.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint12,355.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth83.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence67.9 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty39.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal60.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Wartrace, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,356 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 87th percentile among 4,536 analyzed Tennessee localities and the 80th percentile nationally. Bedford County reports 41,768 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Fayetteville, Tennessee, 29 miles away with 23,114 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 87th percentile among analyzed Tennessee localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

67.9 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 70,291 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 91st national percentile2009: 28,032 acres · 47th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2010: 119,354 acres · 61st regional percentile · 95th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 61st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 57th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 18,933 acres · 36th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2014: 7,994 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 46th national percentile2015: 45,433 acres · 70th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2016: 52,560 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2017: 58,519 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 87th national percentile2018: 63,050 acres · 81st regional percentile · 87th national percentile2019: 90,352 acres · 90th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2020: 91,382 acres · 90th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2021: 62,239 acres · 89th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2022: 63,098 acres · 90th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2023: 64,901 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2024: 8,984 acres · 94th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2025: 12,356 acres · 87th regional percentile · 80th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

83.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa04dfc6a7c5198ae17b1023a6e7
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
51,325 head

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
51,325 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7571873677c5a8ec04a73fd1518a
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37ba79bc7c81f7ae6deb857584ba
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
3,741 head

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,741 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e8c682b6541aeefb2fa4dbc4d7be
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df139fb2b0998db8e607a931f0a9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,784 head

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,784 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:be6ac3ada8ee355968c6c14163e9
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
42,433 acres

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,433 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0fe17d478b286ae78fb91c5a8507
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
682 farms

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
682 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2035debd6dd6fab3c5990341799d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
163 acres

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
163 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dd221f722b357f63781e3fe0864f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
17 farms

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1f88b817e9fe425ad07709a9e4ce
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.4 percent

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b9ec251c747a2e9b1a78b24d7c2f
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
88,460 tons

Bedford County · 2022

How calculated

Bedford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47003:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
88,460 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b483e4e433e7084dfa42c37be77e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation60.3 in
How calculated

WARTRACE 6E, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4721bbe9efab0c362d1e32d1da12
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature56.7 °F
How calculated

WARTRACE 6E, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:446a3689be60b0147e43a3d210be
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.8 miles
How calculated

WARTRACE 6E, TN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Wartrace reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b44b618e97289f6ff13126690505
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0066af069a33bd10e99fd81089ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:238e1bab49643d6ee557e16261bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9a4f54958a109fda3b31f04abd71
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d8ff50a7bd2206b21558662ceb0b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
19.8 0-100

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f447314f07065768378441b409a9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5085200879669231642534535bf9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
16 weeks

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aebe684381158beb909c102ae975
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9ed390bfafc1daa853645d1cd058
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
38.7 0-100

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d87bb800c9eb5744ca093877e057
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:55786cce53efadd1ad9029489828
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
36 percent

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:45c840d357b0381461423e15f758
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
11.3 percent

Wartrace · 2026

How calculated

Wartrace · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:78220962377d632c1e27198fa5a0
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

39.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Wartrace?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.