Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Hopkins, South Carolina

Name: Timothy market intelligence for Hopkins, South Carolina
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Hopkins.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Hopkins

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY

Local mapped footprint7,507.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth59.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75.1 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty51.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal43.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Hopkins

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Hopkins, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,507 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 40th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 59th percentile nationally. Richland County reports 2,754 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mayesville, South Carolina, 38 miles away with 29,442 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 40th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

5 mi

177 ac

10 mi

456 ac

25 mi

7,507 ac

50 mi

62,940 ac

100 mi

199,333 ac

150 mi

360,646 ac

250 mi

949,921 ac

Within 25 miles7,507mapped acres · 0.597% of radius · 2025

40th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities · 59th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hopkins · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 33757
Evidence: FAMILY
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 33757 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3afb4321f73a895bb20a6fe69527
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

75.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

59.5production depth

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

1,432 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,432 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ddb28e3f58582b99b8119d34f219
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

2,493 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,493 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:26f9844027c2ef0a1415f209bbb3
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

4 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 4 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:0ae324d3c259d25d8d7976e3b3f6
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

649 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 649 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d9d0490dcc70a0e112d6c68abe1a
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:21b8739a738421809817eda77241
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

700 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 700 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:60de8af9d1e101904fc3020c2b2a
Official record: Open source ↗

AcresHISTORICAL

2,754 acres

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:hay_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,754 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:0c6a7e87fd137c638d4505059629
Official record: Open source ↗

FarmsHISTORICAL

87 farms

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:hay_farms:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 87 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:908df5dc30a19770c6278bcdac7e
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

51 acres

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 51 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:bfea42967606267e6e981e567ac2
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

3 farms

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 3 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:846358690ed6d5a0b718993b57a2
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

1.9 percent

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:6a2bcb334fce03afc14b3ef7c633
Official record: Open source ↗

ProductionHISTORICAL

4,449 tons

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 45079:hay_production:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 4,449 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e77465dbbde1d8301c4525feb3d5
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation43.7 in

How calculated

COLUMBIA OWENS DWTN AP, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:835cb4d0bad6cfc3963d1289c2b5
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature65.5 °F

How calculated

COLUMBIA OWENS DWTN AP, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:806a031237ac97e7852e77ae9509
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance9.3 miles

How calculated

COLUMBIA OWENS DWTN AP, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hopkins reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7a397c35a37f6bbd128013e6cb16
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

0.1 percent

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:dd4b4a39cf3355933336a4c4dda2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:2ce6bc0ba5304acf44166aee9b86
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3d6678523bdace325234f942605e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D0 category

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:300d9c121d0364f550260cc00ead
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

20 0-100

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:cd5b5ac06a63ca8602fd0c8dcdf3
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

IMPROVING category

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:eddbcb7058d70cf276d830786b5d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

19 weeks

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c06a2810610e9bde01aca5065bc0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

44.7 0-100

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:b825671db88e33a5e8fc7d737afa
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

22.6 0-100

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0822da9fe2409a3eb3e42daa7e9b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

31 0-100

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:08213384036ab54eb56bd36f9773
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

50 percent

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:85e5428cdf769a3f25f28937c764
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

14.7 percent

Hopkins · 2026

How calculated

Hopkins · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ddf662c10774055d01dd84915c52
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

51.2sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Timothy Hay in Mayesville, South Carolina37.8 mi29,442 ac98.1 2. Timothy Hay in Elliott, South Carolina41.9 mi27,348 ac92.6 3. Timothy Hay in Oswego, South Carolina33.5 mi27,058 ac92.3 4. Timothy Hay in St. Charles, South Carolina38.3 mi26,997 ac91.9 5. Timothy Hay in Wisacky, South Carolina41.7 mi26,814 ac91.2 6. Timothy Hay in East Sumter, South Carolina32.4 mi26,309 ac90.4 7. Timothy Hay in Mulberry, South Carolina30.5 mi25,984 ac89.7 8. Timothy Hay in Cope, South Carolina37.1 mi25,607 ac88.4 9. Timothy Hay in Bamberg, South Carolina42.7 mi25,535 ac87.9 10. Timothy Hay in South Sumter, South Carolina29.8 mi24,349 ac85.5

Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Hopkins?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Richland Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hopkins

Alfalfa Hay in Hopkins, South CarolinaExact-type evidence in this locality Barley Hay in Hopkins, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Hopkins, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Hopkins, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Hopkins, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Hopkins, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Timothy Hayin Hopkins, South Carolina

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Timothy Hay in Hopkins?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Hopkins

Methodology & sources

Timothy Hay
in Hopkins, South Carolina