HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Hollywood, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Hollywood.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,427.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth39.8 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty62 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal51.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Hollywood
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Hollywood, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,428 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 4th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Charleston County reports 580 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Cope, South Carolina, 64 miles away with 25,607 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 14.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 4th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles1,428mapped acres · 0.114% of radius · 2025

4th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hollywood · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
6419
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6419 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:30ded3dbc002fa8ffd707deee7cd
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

75.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 647 acres · 4th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2009: 313 acres · 4th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2010: 1,889 acres · 6th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2011: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 724 acres · 5th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2013: 740 acres · 4th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2014: 1,084 acres · 4th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2015: 580 acres · 4th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2016: 802 acres · 4th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2017: 1,234 acres · 4th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2018: 1,461 acres · 4th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2019: 2,018 acres · 4th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2020: 2,241 acres · 4th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2021: 1,693 acres · 4th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2022: 1,853 acres · 4th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2023: 2,085 acres · 4th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2024: 67 acres · 21st regional percentile · 25th national percentile2025: 1,428 acres · 4th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8b7764989ef1e6475fe8a9522ef7
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
1,438 head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,438 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:24907ad7cfa17857abe8dc6bd939
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05dbc8c69aa269925eb9b30411fb
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
503 head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
503 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c9da0a360b512a8ba76f3292076e
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:39ecf20c02241529f0f65f5476ba
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
188 head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
188 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bcdbc48b93599218ca9ac5cea935
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
580 acres

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
580 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:534751cd3695e3f114b17653299f
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
20 farms

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c88e1aaa68058d8e20074c2c7467
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:430625aa0d0c3c6d855822cc915b
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e69057db728a35d33fd0642deab5
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
1,264 tons

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,264 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:831d1ec8f74860a839a557cd5489
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.2 tons/acre

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b47c5186dd75dd6ed6cd23995351
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation51.9 in
How calculated

EDISTO IS MIDDLETON PLANTATION, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d5fce4db329a6be0a88da9cddbfa
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature66.7 °F
How calculated

EDISTO IS MIDDLETON PLANTATION, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e0ebcaf2f6d4add7d821dea8f7b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance12.3 miles
How calculated

EDISTO IS MIDDLETON PLANTATION, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hollywood reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ea95473253dcecbed201ab34afcb
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:072bd27c4c713a77d9a4a0118782
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
14.1 percent

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e01a300a3c748f9951ac5f74cf19
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6b1bbc82680d6ba2b8754660eb26
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:31a0423550fbb5fdce9c9f4114fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
42.8 0-100

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b3fbd2e7fc1067f1d203928009a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:41ddd8c619770d5fdae2956be81d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
34 weeks

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1e0db7ba9988f78de2d026a1b296
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bf5c17fbad7513d1278acc19089c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4c3180bc8af73f5e9c66fb228eb3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.3 0-100

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9a2763a12f8dec78ed3aa63d17d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
64.3 percent

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0e77c5e10ff6932b36de97cc8c38
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
53.9 percent

Hollywood · 2026

How calculated

Hollywood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1216026d12c40dc60f3c5ff09bf2
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

62sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Cope, South Carolina63.7 mi25,607 ac96.82. Timothy Hay in Bamberg, South Carolina61.2 mi25,535 ac96.73. Timothy Hay in Ehrhardt, South Carolina52.8 mi24,222 ac93.34. Timothy Hay in Lodge, South Carolina48.8 mi23,475 ac91.35. Timothy Hay in Cordova, South Carolina62.9 mi23,478 ac90.66. Timothy Hay in Govan, South Carolina65.1 mi23,466 ac90.57. Timothy Hay in Olar, South Carolina64.2 mi23,077 ac89.48. Timothy Hay in Branchville, South Carolina49.6 mi22,293 ac87.89. Timothy Hay in Rowesville, South Carolina56.5 mi22,065 ac86.810. Timothy Hay in Ulmer, South Carolina63.2 mi22,148 ac86.7
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Hollywood?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Charleston Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hollywood

Alfalfa Hay in Hollywood, South CarolinaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Hollywood, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hollywood, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Hollywood, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hollywood, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hollywood, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.