Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Andrews, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Andrews.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint7,920.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth62.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence77.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty50.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal51.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Andrews, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,921 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 44th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 61st percentile nationally. Georgetown County reports 390 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mayesville, South Carolina, 52 miles away with 29,442 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 89.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 44th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

77.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,285 acres · 13th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2009: 1,870 acres · 14th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2010: 3,768 acres · 13th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 2,747 acres · 12th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2013: 3,856 acres · 14th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2014: 3,750 acres · 12th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2015: 3,141 acres · 12th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2016: 2,632 acres · 11th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2017: 4,979 acres · 10th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2018: 5,636 acres · 12th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2019: 7,454 acres · 12th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2020: 8,427 acres · 12th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2021: 7,659 acres · 13th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2022: 7,608 acres · 12th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2023: 8,482 acres · 14th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2024: 1,924 acres · 70th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2025: 7,921 acres · 44th regional percentile · 61st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

62.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
286 head

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
286 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd854245b3c063a9df611d935228
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
414 head

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
414 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ab0aefc7351cff89f60d3de8f2c9
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:395c27e1b3e96026d349825cc689
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
167 head

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
167 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d77c73e2ef7fc3e6d1d857220236
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1ed198ad7a89c57b9439b462f7f9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
58 head

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
58 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c93fc04676a13df2f0748f6ecbac
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
390 acres

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
390 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:40fa810b83ba858f814001f0757a
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:68684a0cd6d0127b6cf18e5d2c51
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b6b4efa12933621b2da523dbe6d1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
2 farms

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f19e520befcbfcebaeb472c71f0
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
1,070 tons

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,070 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d14910948231ccbfdcb696220f31
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.7 tons/acre

Georgetown County · 2022

How calculated

Georgetown County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45043:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:640fcce713692552b0e63e50a197
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation51.9 in
How calculated

JAMESTOWN, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:beae0fab9470a49fa865b5e37621
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature64.6 °F
How calculated

JAMESTOWN, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c65b85f8348a185c0a3d870f10f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance13.7 miles
How calculated

JAMESTOWN, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Andrews reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0b8d782a346c9666d8c0b6d328d4
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c687152b1607a8ddadd7cf039920
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
89.7 percent

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8446d0b1d26636378900f7337eac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
17 percent

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bddee3f977eca3c8f571c7dc0fec
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:71870a8b97a89ea201554d8fb60a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
61.4 0-100

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b3196e47404e6df19b2bf43b5d34
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:573a22b3e3126ad7b77998f4682d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
34 weeks

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:388ab7cea69bd3c47935d9d11846
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
79.5 0-100

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ff8d34d2b3ec72561b5c0fd32f7a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.8 0-100

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e9a345437aa408934b3f9c1b730d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
77.2 0-100

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a15ea4be52936dd32e4924c07af7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
66.1 percent

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f933f053cff6aee9011145518ba0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
55.8 percent

Andrews · 2026

How calculated

Andrews · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:46d2a265de878f8d8ad3c861ef73
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

50.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Andrews?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 83 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.