Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Wilburton Number Two, Pennsylvania

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Wilburton Number Two.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint6,838.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth71.6 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence80.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty43.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal48 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Wilburton Number Two, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,839 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 59th percentile among 18,027 analyzed Pennsylvania localities and the 54th percentile nationally. Columbia County reports 6,191 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Danville, Pennsylvania, 16 miles away with 9,183 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 59th percentile among analyzed Pennsylvania localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

80.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 24,874 acres · 10th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2009: 25,639 acres · 24th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2010: 38,376 acres · 12th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2011: 81,771 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 90th national percentile2012: 91,579 acres · 45th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2013: 22,887 acres · 39th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2014: 18,513 acres · 30th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2015: 39,582 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2016: 34,969 acres · 41st regional percentile · 80th national percentile2017: 42,995 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 79th national percentile2018: 40,226 acres · 29th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2019: 48,438 acres · 49th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2020: 49,967 acres · 49th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2021: 37,018 acres · 54th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2022: 35,285 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 79th national percentile2023: 35,070 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 80th national percentile2024: 7,362 acres · 64th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2025: 6,839 acres · 59th regional percentile · 54th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

71.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,589 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,589 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:56623c4944c38ee088330ea469f1
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
6,839 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,839 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f6afab3e53135653bdad60423621
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
2,233 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,233 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d820d1ef201aeddfdf30205df35b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
714 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
714 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f8af4ea1ded893051fab7c809b5
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8ea961c864e79d8c5731914352ea
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
520 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
520 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d75c8576aac396c8e9b96d49404f
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
9,379 acres

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,379 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dfd3cbc76c75781f68dfc230c758
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
289 farms

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
289 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:345b5283f88b7de4f0633968eab1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
84 acres

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
84 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:53cfeae0731a9a70dd4596405573
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
8 farms

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:24beb6ce91b46af6b23aceaea5ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.9 percent

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1559d1f45c4daae94a8a488df86e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
17,279 tons

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42037:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,279 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3b7614c35750351bc33f1a7a5bf4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation48 in
How calculated

BEAR GAP, PA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:78f9f86bd5724188cd17ca9eee95
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.5 °F
How calculated

BEAR GAP, PA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5ff3b58723c8f24d9bef136b251a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7 miles
How calculated

BEAR GAP, PA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Wilburton Number Two reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4cff307bc581baf0fff62502ce67
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f889044dc6bc64c0c46abc450bef
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3fe896584e12e5d7a76f57fb1d1c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0867a6f89b1e3fbfcffa0a70eb96
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc36dc122462c0e61e24cc03ece2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0.3 0-100

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c07406adcc30ae46042a1cd062d1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:524451b4ada6327b98d4b99706e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
15 weeks

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:46ae5f3d06f1e300dc97b9ef168f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.1 0-100

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7704bcac66f7b26df206678b14ef
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c8123048362e9d6f1c18e7771b71
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
1.3 0-100

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9d828ecc642599689e76585ac7b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
33 percent

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:80e19f5bae3fe854652f78944bfe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wilburton Number Two · 2026

How calculated

Wilburton Number Two · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d109ab26e86b15b7849e7f7db2c0
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

43.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Wilburton Number Two?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.