Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Applewold, Pennsylvania

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Applewold.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint5,117.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth63.4 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence84.3 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty48.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal44.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Applewold, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,117 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 42nd percentile among 18,027 analyzed Pennsylvania localities and the 43rd percentile nationally. Armstrong County reports 16,939 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Parker, Pennsylvania, 21 miles away with 8,336 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 42nd percentile among analyzed Pennsylvania localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

84.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 75,485 acres · 74th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2009: 39,746 acres · 56th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2010: 73,593 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2011: 91,460 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2012: 89,482 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2013: 27,585 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 74th national percentile2014: 30,715 acres · 60th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2015: 57,101 acres · 70th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2016: 60,770 acres · 75th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2017: 65,749 acres · 65th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2018: 69,722 acres · 68th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2019: 70,421 acres · 77th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2020: 71,335 acres · 76th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2021: 56,833 acres · 81st regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2022: 61,543 acres · 88th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2023: 55,967 acres · 87th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2024: 23 acres · 28th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2025: 5,117 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 43rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

63.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
5,565 head

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,565 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d80cb6e0de8c2f4d90715a15b91
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
14,689 head

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,689 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c71a3af71f5f57c80f92a24ad723
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
2,440 head

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,440 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc2055d0e701fdd7ccf74858b51b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
936 head

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
936 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d5ca383f10958eb77a40d7fc75f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:914e43a34276bf0e0255e1fe8e5f
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
162 head

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
162 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2532781fcc4b5fae6074f986d00d
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
25,775 acres

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25,775 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5d1ad791bcda71d81ebee826e8a8
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
424 farms

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
424 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fd0bcf4aae45d405c79d01b48b14
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
35 acres

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a5acdf51fca2ffbb3c1c82848450
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:900cdfa3e1299686cef34c9ecd8e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.1 percent

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34632fdb21f067099d567e016826
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
48,418 tons

Armstrong County · 2022

How calculated

Armstrong County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
42005:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
48,418 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:59b0b8517ca381aad2468bea6d8d
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation44.3 in
How calculated

FORD CITY 4 S DAM, PA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:398d484e1d42a39c7e679dd88e8d
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.6 °F
How calculated

FORD CITY 4 S DAM, PA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9c14fee02e132592ef4c0111d3e9
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.5 miles
How calculated

FORD CITY 4 S DAM, PA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Applewold reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1fda8f7559e473c0433c10052772
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:da4e1c3a2ff460ee46477e68d456
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c0066e3c7607b631b2684015616
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8090f18c566ca7f339a441a3687a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f52f5ccd9ff6ac765e5e0432f627
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:869324099a5ce06eab8538651540
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:39d668dda4be36e12ffe8a042e3f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
1 weeks

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fdd74281a4d162e1b20d9aa91c6d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cba29bd1944c70c07044321575c1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
8.4 0-100

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b21f654eaeb419bbf046f9796162
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:10f85b9ee8d045fd2dab0fb59b05
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
1.9 percent

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9af4613a4ff2072ccefd52a0b440
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Applewold · 2026

How calculated

Applewold · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3735df3b2368c1cd
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5d8f8b2669907d8b4642b023c8f4
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

48.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Applewold?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.