Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Tri-City, Oregon

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Tri-City.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint12,161.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth87.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence77.4 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty35.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal31.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Tri-City, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,162 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 90th percentile among 3,834 analyzed Oregon localities and the 80th percentile nationally. Douglas County reports 24,883 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Roseburg North, Oregon, 20 miles away with 15,488 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 92% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 90th percentile among analyzed Oregon localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

77.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,338 acres · 38th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2009: 3,106 acres · 35th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2010: 4,893 acres · 50th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2011: 7,012 acres · 44th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2012: 1,736 acres · 18th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2013: 2,437 acres · 24th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2014: 2,611 acres · 19th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2015: 4,504 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 41st national percentile2016: 10,251 acres · 69th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2017: 13,021 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 54th national percentile2018: 17,310 acres · 77th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2019: 15,244 acres · 81st regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2020: 15,508 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2021: 11,380 acres · 79th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2022: 14,375 acres · 86th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2023: 12,532 acres · 77th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2024: 581 acres · 49th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2025: 12,162 acres · 90th regional percentile · 80th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

87.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
20,171 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,171 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cb8fbf89401a697df49575a45486
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
40,215 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
40,215 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c0924a10a3ec639550c7fa94f368
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
221 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
221 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:898e2ff7a8b613e06df293ff7763
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,911 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,911 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd8799268a8136003b08a24b8b11
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9c70a01e0b2c24082254e04c78ac
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
2,641 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,641 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f044c8795a45e8f466969cf25e18
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
25,771 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25,771 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65c412225db3a7d5807cd4f811a6
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
641 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
641 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:86dad749ae2fa928e413523826e0
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
6,521 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,521 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c4332ecb09894330acf86908118f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
190 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
190 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:edb9e8ddf138c4a3d1aa50baaab1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
25.3 percent

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d5ccf2d102acd2e961540ab14eb
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
46,506 tons

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
46,506 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc11a3e70dc0c91f12a4a803938f
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation31.1 in
How calculated

RIDDLE, OR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:740922f1aac69306e37e6ccb43a4
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature56.7 °F
How calculated

RIDDLE, OR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5af0ad902e956adfd010bb78c5d8
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance3.9 miles
How calculated

RIDDLE, OR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Tri-City reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2fe583819e1aa1d7d943d5719495
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bdc74c58d03085d3b53aef5c54b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
92 percent

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9a96b5b70c524239f62f4451aa3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
47.5 percent

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2d7459ac9bc87d25b884c35a9fc0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a1f6c4918238e1900d7ff497ac04
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
67.9 0-100

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f584805ecb821599222ea60a1013
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:78e0fe65b1aa9e610f167f719c58
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
33 weeks

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:55a8c1fb9dc01093dd96f3b3b58f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.4 0-100

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:35b9103d0c553487d83554105c74
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.3 0-100

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:abae708ce83ebe1e5b7f096ab6d3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.1 0-100

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d50d1f1018bc2ee443da1eef41cc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
75.9 percent

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:68b96e91618ee9b98ca905ed0975
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
37.9 percent

Tri-City · 2026

How calculated

Tri-City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b57035a625a63c6c8540d0c43ee2
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

35.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Tri-City?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.