Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Whitakers, North Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Whitakers.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint12,358 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth76.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence83.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty43.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal48.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Whitakers, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,358 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 66th percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities and the 80th percentile nationally. Nash County reports 8,309 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Maury, North Carolina, 44 miles away with 27,973 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 63.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 66th percentile among analyzed North Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

83.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 8,495 acres · 36th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2009: 9,371 acres · 54th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2010: 10,379 acres · 45th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2011: 5,557 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 56th national percentile2012: 28,382 acres · 40th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2013: 34,120 acres · 44th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2014: 25,565 acres · 40th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2015: 20,285 acres · 50th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2016: 20,639 acres · 51st regional percentile · 68th national percentile2017: 20,932 acres · 39th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2018: 22,629 acres · 40th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2019: 25,194 acres · 47th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2020: 26,637 acres · 47th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2021: 19,868 acres · 54th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2022: 18,827 acres · 55th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2023: 19,638 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2024: 780 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2025: 12,358 acres · 66th regional percentile · 80th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

76.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9f2d9cf5b352df5ca045b54336f1
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
4,944 head

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,944 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:67de4154452becd06f56f5c8d9a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:73af0e8c85b6721920a64f6aa319
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
455 head

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
455 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5dd612bd7e578c8aafa6c0508cc4
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f23ecbcc4d2ff901078440c4e5ca
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
393 head

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
393 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:474a4d45d42fd114c1ceca420b5d
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
8,864 acres

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,864 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:103da97e79ff5ba43adfa5756e75
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
97 farms

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
97 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b7db2fde4b775a75415b418a0479
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
65 acres

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
65 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:895e8dc5395b5e5f113efca9e5f2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e0af0591031e10ebd16c7e2f9f02
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fe21e7d4c7a06bd45be6e971493b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
19,321 tons

Nash County · 2022

How calculated

Nash County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37127:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,321 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:46dcdbf0fba0af5dcbee9c02cf54
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation48.6 in
How calculated

ROCKY MT 8 ESE, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed2ec646aae4882453a183b8eecc
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature59.9 °F
How calculated

ROCKY MT 8 ESE, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4d2d1a4ba0c5de88bfed3faf490f
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance14.8 miles
How calculated

ROCKY MT 8 ESE, NC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Whitakers reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:81765d54db02d93a4f36e5b12e71
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:71a9ab0ce91643cdb26332b07dce
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
63.5 percent

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:80d866d62490345ad7b5064a0321
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
16.5 percent

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9222066691fb41c2ae866a9a1be1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:49c568ba3f7609a4dbf62083176a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
56 0-100

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b13229e8baefd29f06b3ae1748c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5ad56e612ecb8284d5e9e6af7f45
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
50 weeks

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f5584aef81427d7678083f95188e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f5c6211cb462ed5581f6985fb147
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
69.4 0-100

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0e9ae8f73b166b303a1fbc6a2461
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
42.2 0-100

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:54519b23907709523222affac7f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
92.6 percent

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2c63a7112556cbe84f7461040b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
61.8 percent

Whitakers · 2026

How calculated

Whitakers · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7220fc8c63ad00ca8347675039df
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

43.6sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Whitakers?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 85 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.