HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Marshallberg, North Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Marshallberg.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint720.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth40.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence78.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty63.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal55.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Marshallberg
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Marshallberg, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 721 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 3rd percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities and the 12th percentile nationally. Carteret County reports 149 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Deep Run, North Carolina, 74 miles away with 41,194 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 3rd percentile among analyzed North Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles721mapped acres · 0.057% of radius · 2025

3th percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities · 12th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Marshallberg · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
3241
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3241 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9ce982e174c1597ff230fc45aeee
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

78.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 39 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 5th national percentile2009: 17 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2010: 210 acres · 7th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2011: 258 acres · 7th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2012: 175 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 24th national percentile2013: 232 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 14th national percentile2014: 277 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 13th national percentile2015: 230 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 10th national percentile2016: 216 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2017: 283 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2018: 270 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 6th national percentile2019: 182 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 6th national percentile2020: 316 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 7th national percentile2021: 190 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 6th national percentile2022: 187 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 5th national percentile2023: 125 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2024: 248 acres · 47th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2025: 721 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

40.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
266 head

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
266 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a630f4a0270c9d980ba21a1b5134
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
392 head

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
392 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dec66cdbd8bc887bf860ce5a395a
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e2ce784709c3f47cd3f985a41aa9
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
110 head

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
110 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:582996dfb82fe743c38477396547
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2617b9e73fd998742f289658d0f2
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
105 head

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
105 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e4cbbe5b659ebd3224e8859ce758
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
149 acres

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
149 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3401bebf1df2690801448fafbb38
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
7 farms

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:03f342193e7015fd03a1d6ec8628
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3144acbcc86789a950386999a866
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f8e33f779152c258320fe5f0f05
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
279 tons

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
279 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1f1c3b52bae5903290ffa35ae9d9
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.9 tons/acre

Carteret County · 2022

How calculated

Carteret County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37031:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5d84351313fe8d6e98c36bf1d610
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation55.7 in
How calculated

BEAUFORT MICHAEL J SMITH FLD, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:239cc9b58ca8dd690b168fc534b4
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature63.8 °F
How calculated

BEAUFORT MICHAEL J SMITH FLD, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:66b6d0b4be3a1fdccb08e39d88be
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.4 miles
How calculated

BEAUFORT MICHAEL J SMITH FLD, NC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Marshallberg reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8ffb363e533ea45fdf205f0435cb
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
1.5 percent

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0a3230d555659347f670f047cf99
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6853870618a848811e45545cf161
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:43236f09e38f7247861543efbfe3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc0b2d6d960e903cb3346180c95d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
16.9 0-100

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:807f9bb7dde136f8347a7ca84fe0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f4fcc0966e473dc9ba490c6aa000
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
22 weeks

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6773ee6f38277b1f3f06976dd3a4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aa346ed1454f88544516e1cd3333
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c85f3f2eee60f044d450910ea316
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
17 0-100

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9294df5b1e3b3a66d65d0298435d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
41.2 percent

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:219a4ac020a1393ca6b6fa1f21b5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
24.5 percent

Marshallberg · 2026

How calculated

Marshallberg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:64122997e94a770bd9231fa70ec6
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

63.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Deep Run, North Carolina73.9 mi41,194 ac96.32. Timothy Hay in Pink Hill, North Carolina73.4 mi40,487 ac953. Timothy Hay in Jackson Heights, North Carolina72.1 mi38,757 ac924. Timothy Hay in Greenevers, North Carolina80.4 mi38,845 ac91.75. Timothy Hay in Beulaville, North Carolina72.6 mi37,854 ac90.36. Timothy Hay in Potters Hill, North Carolina69.4 mi36,595 ac88.27. Timothy Hay in Kinston, North Carolina71.9 mi36,204 ac87.38. Timothy Hay in Chinquapin, North Carolina74.7 mi34,772 ac84.69. Timothy Hay in Graingers, North Carolina69.4 mi32,118 ac8010. Timothy Hay in Hookerton, North Carolina77.6 mi30,825 ac77.2
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Marshallberg?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Carteret Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Marshallberg

Alfalfa Hay in Marshallberg, North CarolinaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Marshallberg, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Marshallberg, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Marshallberg, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Marshallberg, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Marshallberg, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 63 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.