Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Chapel Hill.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint20,620.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth84.9 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence80.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty38.3 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal43.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Chapel Hill, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 20,621 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 83rd percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities and the 94th percentile nationally. Orange County reports 7,622 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Dunn, North Carolina, 49 miles away with 28,587 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 29.4% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 83rd percentile among analyzed North Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

80.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 29,319 acres · 85th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2009: 22,446 acres · 89th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2010: 55,288 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 84th national percentile2011: 46,262 acres · 85th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2012: 88,805 acres · 78th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2013: 83,916 acres · 80th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2014: 90,897 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 95th national percentile2015: 27,651 acres · 60th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2016: 33,287 acres · 71st regional percentile · 79th national percentile2017: 52,141 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 84th national percentile2018: 52,073 acres · 71st regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2019: 49,098 acres · 77th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2020: 52,822 acres · 81st regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2021: 29,746 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 75th national percentile2022: 27,389 acres · 76th regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2023: 27,634 acres · 75th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2024: 120 acres · 36th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2025: 20,621 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

84.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
3,504 head

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,504 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ce3a1baf7779c5a24013d366229
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
6,271 head

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,271 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:79ee95a99c83815727dcd665d780
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
45 head

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
45 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:be88a243fdb5a4fd18bfc30c7056
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,000 head

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,000 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:89d18083d6e7f2d0f17833117548
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2372fd58d594edffdbf77d5dfd93
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f982c72adc23bece6a4b3680e1bf
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
7,701 acres

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,701 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f53b78999425a6228b00da29f3ca
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
226 farms

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
226 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:efcc3d47541501a2c619cb425430
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
74 acres

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
74 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4462cec22895f67483d60a29b248
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
6 farms

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef42f3ee394730732d6b9b2bc98f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1 percent

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f82a682f96a014f1bf2714ebd5e7
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
13,034 tons

Orange County · 2022

How calculated

Orange County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37135:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,034 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:090df9e94c1e2e035372d9e98725
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation43.6 in
How calculated

CHAPEL HILL WILLIAMS AP, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3015217fdda35d55830fdd1149e
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature60.6 °F
How calculated

CHAPEL HILL WILLIAMS AP, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5f32f2036b314d1c6a4337c8bd6b
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance1.3 miles
How calculated

CHAPEL HILL WILLIAMS AP, NC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Chapel Hill reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ca99b0f0136de3d33ccec3a9464
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:da5aea8072da72a39660fd27432c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
29.4 percent

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:892d6fce357ff6a641c5b6f3d612
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:95edaa01b6dde53e032debc1639a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ba7f9c47f2b4f2a26df375f35b76
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
45.9 0-100

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6b9728e55b71a0875ee40c25ae1b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0e6007dfdd18f486312edfa9e96b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
42 weeks

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b78449caf16294ca5649a61b9f8d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
97.5 0-100

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ad88d65a70b44189d092dc5cb57c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7a780eee8fded1d8c80feb7bfb06
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
45.9 0-100

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ff854231fc711037a54914a3e41
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
85.1 percent

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:765d29e9d5ad6f52da25d10269d6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
58 percent

Chapel Hill · 2026

How calculated

Chapel Hill · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:279160f230d562f22bd099eb9caf
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

38.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Chapel Hill?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 84 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.