HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Republican City, Nebraska

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Republican City.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,463.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth40.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence61.4 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal24.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Republican City
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Republican City, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,463 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 13th percentile among 5,337 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Harlan County reports 1,303 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Cawker City, Kansas, 58 miles away with 15,704 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 61.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 13th percentile among analyzed Nebraska localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles1,463mapped acres · 0.116% of radius · 2025

13th percentile among 5,337 analyzed Nebraska localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Republican City · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
6580
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6580 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e4d8e91dd8a29fc7feebf9b97e9b
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

61.4 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 517 acres · 20th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 662 acres · 12th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2010: 0 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 3,145 acres · 11th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2012: 2,887 acres · 13th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2013: 4,932 acres · 16th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2014: 4,436 acres · 12th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2015: 254 acres · 7th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2016: 181 acres · 4th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2017: 226 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 8th national percentile2018: 1,063 acres · 8th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2019: 768 acres · 10th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2020: 1,001 acres · 12th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2021: 1,242 acres · 15th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2022: 1,204 acres · 15th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2023: 1,512 acres · 16th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2024: 12 acres · 5th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2025: 1,463 acres · 13th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

40.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fef12ae0a177d82fd6c22df1e468
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
38,709 head

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
38,709 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f63b20a6ceecb4002ac7c4c0148
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b9cf1358b98d83320896dda383fc
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
47 head

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
47 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a1591c766640aedcb364358047fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29beb9dfa76c1cd43ffd49202c9f
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7adb8f98cd8edd62f0065827b8a8
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
4,583 acres

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,583 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d55d23792f2405599481e32b6ce
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
82 farms

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
82 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:219049630bda220a4aaf16410194
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,312 acres

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,312 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:025c086fb149860995dd88656955
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
28 farms

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9352d433aa139cf26c1512ce7120
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
28.6 percent

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df75ece2660ccb1b3ae781e069bd
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
17,913 tons

Harlan County · 2022

How calculated

Harlan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31083:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,913 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c42d6b9901076def62609129d195
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation24.7 in
How calculated

HARLAN CO LAKE, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:78235049f407cd2fec1465199ba9
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature52.3 °F
How calculated

HARLAN CO LAKE, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33382aac5081317af69b8da84a76
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.8 miles
How calculated

HARLAN CO LAKE, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Republican City reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0a4d55665962969b14da7eeacd20
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
99.5 percent

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c73a0bd0abff05c534b1a668e235
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
61.6 percent

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c934b22479ddd9ae4dfdd1c7b063
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8c162f309f87d1e911a34f2718bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eb19aa6c0a5f20f61f05965499b4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
52.2 0-100

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eb12b5a63a56d9f0684d0236c1dc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98182122f3187a786fed5e4c3809
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
27 weeks

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f52280da8be58d94ccf4bdb1c2a3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.5 0-100

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3f4561e9a8cc27cf91a0edd9ecf9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
33 0-100

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:756ad99f33dd54723d3f0260631d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
52.3 0-100

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1b85f3d7026206210b2b15276085
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
52.9 percent

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8067fe8a2b33d4fbd06e9dd40c15
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
39.3 percent

Republican City · 2026

How calculated

Republican City · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9410f1576da5a2efc99c27453f80
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Cawker City, Kansas58.4 mi15,704 ac97.12. Timothy Hay in Downs, Kansas54.5 mi15,312 ac95.43. Timothy Hay in Osborne, Kansas53.3 mi14,828 ac93.24. Timothy Hay in Ionia, Kansas55.5 mi13,109 ac84.85. Timothy Hay in Portis, Kansas46.5 mi12,465 ac82.26. Timothy Hay in Mankato, Kansas57.9 mi10,543 ac72.57. Timothy Hay in Alton, Kansas46 mi10,079 ac70.88. Timothy Hay in Gaylord, Kansas37 mi8,820 ac65.39. Timothy Hay in Esbon, Kansas45.9 mi8,724 ac64.410. Timothy Hay in Burr Oak, Kansas51 mi8,554 ac63.3
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Republican City?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Harlan Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Republican City

Alfalfa Hay in Republican City, NebraskaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Republican City, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Republican City, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Republican City, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Republican City, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Republican City, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.