HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Bloomington, Nebraska

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Bloomington.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint2,135.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth47.2 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence61.4 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty57.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal26.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Bloomington
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Bloomington, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,136 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 25th percentile among 5,337 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 22nd percentile nationally. Franklin County reports 2,256 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Glen Elder, Kansas, 57 miles away with 15,789 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 14.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 25th percentile among analyzed Nebraska localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles2,136mapped acres · 0.17% of radius · 2025

25th percentile among 5,337 analyzed Nebraska localities · 22th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Bloomington · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
9604
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9604 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a32ba72b39a9a7968a76ec3eff50
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

61.4 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 903 acres · 35th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2009: 954 acres · 17th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 5,394 acres · 30th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2012: 4,221 acres · 24th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2013: 7,487 acres · 37th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2014: 7,312 acres · 21st regional percentile · 45th national percentile2015: 503 acres · 9th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2016: 288 acres · 7th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2017: 399 acres · 6th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2018: 1,452 acres · 9th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2019: 948 acres · 13th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2020: 1,303 acres · 19th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2021: 1,567 acres · 21st regional percentile · 18th national percentile2022: 1,568 acres · 20th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2023: 2,050 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2024: 13 acres · 6th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2025: 2,136 acres · 25th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

47.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
15,721 head

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,721 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b308a5ec66c4f11274441a449a92
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
29,050 head

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,050 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8d6256fcbf006001e4acd66b11b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
14 head

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f1ec2d784f53f60e186f4cb70c68
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
129 head

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
129 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:30c7069f5c760f86eced6c29434e
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d246f9728dec7ae8aede22f57225
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
- head

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8877dda306453cdff60217686c54
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
7,353 acres

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,353 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ea9c430e0345231643ece564dc33
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
88 farms

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
88 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed420e5d2086156a4af331e748d5
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
3,284 acres

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,284 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:881c2ccbbdb4c27e5638f75beabf
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
27 farms

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
27 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:deeeab925ff954c78a1e3ce057ef
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
44.7 percent

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7bf605c6789c5de4bcea08986cbb
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
25,017 tons

Franklin County · 2022

How calculated

Franklin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31061:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25,017 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e33b1f3df4cea6caef706d7b8afa
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation26.5 in
How calculated

FRANKLIN #2, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0e7b28f521a91d4fb422ff99a592
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.2 °F
How calculated

FRANKLIN #2, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:35c5a2781e5d8d57628162ebd821
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.9 miles
How calculated

FRANKLIN #2, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bloomington reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:69db4cd829b5b5a3130a3d876e9c
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
47.6 percent

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:72745c8e66d8e9ffe081347daa63
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
14.1 percent

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b05c586ffe4d5f82886c3b935eb8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:680e596e673390cc6c5af1f66ffb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2aef1b9bcf12dfc56940f05b6b2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
30.4 0-100

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e3760ee753f69a4771332973dbac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:964ed1d26ff5b2fbd37c992c7ce1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
25 weeks

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:326fdeb941e6fef80811e04fbdc7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.6 0-100

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c805f7840b4aca96e8eb6b37505
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
30.6 0-100

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2bc9a6836592f8b88d04ad79ea24
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.3 0-100

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ce785b771e5b7023139dd3ad6dce
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
41.3 percent

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f7dbb1ef9c1b0503c1259a0fd95d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
14.4 percent

Bloomington · 2026

How calculated

Bloomington · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:720b0fc6cd0f7e2af1ba530b6d9f
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Glen Elder, Kansas56.5 mi15,789 ac97.22. Timothy Hay in Cawker City, Kansas51.6 mi15,704 ac973. Timothy Hay in Downs, Kansas48.3 mi15,312 ac95.34. Timothy Hay in Osborne, Kansas48.6 mi14,828 ac935. Timothy Hay in Ionia, Kansas47.4 mi13,109 ac84.96. Timothy Hay in Jewell, Kansas55.3 mi12,986 ac83.97. Timothy Hay in Portis, Kansas41 mi12,465 ac82.28. Timothy Hay in Mankato, Kansas48.8 mi10,543 ac72.69. Timothy Hay in Alton, Kansas43.5 mi10,079 ac70.710. Timothy Hay in Webber, Kansas54.2 mi9,669 ac68.2
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Bloomington?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Franklin Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Bloomington

Alfalfa Hay in Bloomington, NebraskaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Bloomington, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Bloomington, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Bloomington, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Bloomington, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Bloomington, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.