Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Stanford, Montana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Stanford.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint15,007.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth81 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence80.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty44.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal17.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Stanford, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 15,008 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 76th percentile among 4,473 analyzed Montana localities and the 87th percentile nationally. Judith Basin County reports 10,525 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Flat Willow Colony, Montana, 87 miles away with 24,516 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 0.2% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 76th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

80.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 13,592 acres · 71st regional percentile · 59th national percentile2009: 16,587 acres · 78th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2010: 10,818 acres · 65th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2011: 11,218 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 65th national percentile2012: 14,806 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 66th national percentile2013: 20,614 acres · 84th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2014: 52,813 acres · 69th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2015: 28,137 acres · 69th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2016: 32,530 acres · 71st regional percentile · 78th national percentile2017: 28,036 acres · 64th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2018: 48,167 acres · 68th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2019: 43,535 acres · 76th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2020: 42,928 acres · 77th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2021: 44,038 acres · 76th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2022: 52,181 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2023: 52,752 acres · 84th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2024: 3,889 acres · 80th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2025: 15,008 acres · 76th regional percentile · 87th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

81production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:77297440ba3f480d9f137e1eadb7
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
62,999 head

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
62,999 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:78a0db62508267653c9bfed77080
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9df8f79d2d766def3dc412dbcc69
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
527 head

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
527 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:420f9f8da30f62535184a1ecee43
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:35c64aec2b0cc1028d2968a16007
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3fc9dc2e0397ca8f3eab4df4b0a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
61,574 acres

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
61,574 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:42d17d907a295b2fad2d652ace3d
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
154 farms

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
154 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0e8fdfe43a0fc5dfb1a34dbdfb11
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
7,758 acres

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,758 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ba46bfc9541df0643c0dcb8db211
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
38 farms

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
38 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:411d02f6eea7987459de5b75f4ea
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
12.6 percent

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05ee49ea2c2218e317a629be3212
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
95,194 tons

Judith Basin County · 2022

How calculated

Judith Basin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30045:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
95,194 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:311018c77e43778254702c2b4865
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation17.3 in
How calculated

STANFORD, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8854bdd44dde29f5394e0958fe5f
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.6 °F
How calculated

STANFORD, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:25942a98a4277389b13aa0e56620
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.3 miles
How calculated

STANFORD, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Stanford reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc747468e3ce08f630a7702bbed0
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
64.1 percent

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a2359fcb675571703099013f874b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.2 percent

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9313359569e16afbe9125d51393f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6c1bc3df3ff9b301fb1df5193bf9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:66bbd1797d1c13c58a1bc8caf6e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
32.8 0-100

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f2ea913893fb06bf4bb27e0e75fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:42887d83220c571c1dc618f7d6e2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
9 weeks

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e58130f86a268d81063f2ba38ac7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4d4fb57f2c6e54f9e77a920e4651
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
55.4 0-100

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fbf89bb25efa53816019dac22f85
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
26.5 0-100

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:52ccab70719b2a1cfadc600a563c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
45.7 percent

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eab2aa62ef2ba796122197c4a4d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
9.5 percent

Stanford · 2026

How calculated

Stanford · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8077397733f18ac946bc4f96eb47
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

44.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Stanford?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.