Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Roberts, Montana

Name: Timothy market intelligence for Roberts, Montana
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Roberts.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Roberts

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY

Local mapped footprint29,805.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth95.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence85.1 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty32.4 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal22.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Roberts

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Roberts, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 29,805 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 100th percentile among 4,473 analyzed Montana localities and the 98th percentile nationally. Carbon County reports 18,140 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Boyd, Montana, 9.4 miles away with 30,669 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 70.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplySTRONG

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

Roberts ranks among the strongest persistent mapped non-alfalfa hay footprints in Montana.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m
usda-cdl-2008-30m
usda-cdl-2009-30m
usda-cdl-2010-30m
usda-cdl-2011-30m
usda-cdl-2012-30m
usda-cdl-2013-30m
usda-cdl-2014-30m
usda-cdl-2015-30m
usda-cdl-2016-30m
usda-cdl-2017-30m
usda-cdl-2018-30m
usda-cdl-2019-30m
usda-cdl-2020-30m
usda-cdl-2021-30m
usda-cdl-2022-30m
usda-cdl-2023-30m
usda-cdl-2024-30m
usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

5 mi

7,199 ac

10 mi

13,581 ac

25 mi

29,805 ac

50 mi

54,556 ac

100 mi

142,343 ac

150 mi

323,136 ac

250 mi

905,147 ac

Within 25 miles29,805mapped acres · 2.372% of radius · 2025

100th percentile among 4,473 analyzed Montana localities · 98th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Roberts · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 134020
Evidence: FAMILY
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 134020 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8cc246a1a713a4b30a5217330943
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

85.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

95.5production depth

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

26,151 head

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 26,151 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:089cdb1be07e3d325c529bd539e7
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

52,213 head

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 52,213 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:48aebd3389ba3c1b792cf98f2bb8
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

16 head

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 16 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4950f374be384ff29eb68a0610b4
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

1,749 head

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,749 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b74498b5c25bb439065d20abf1c3
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c3a2b926dc84bd0cf04e1625617b
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

320 head

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 320 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c1d48688873b905bc502056c8221
Official record: Open source ↗

AcresHISTORICAL

46,533 acres

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:hay_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 46,533 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:335e46360e9cbde0b3c4965459f5
Official record: Open source ↗

FarmsHISTORICAL

371 farms

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:hay_farms:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 371 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8ba7cc1688603d0b14b722975c2f
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

35,505 acres

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 35,505 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:6e9a5013f45f4bf4598827dac9c3
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

296 farms

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 296 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:882c98d20c7b6dd164307bf621a3
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

76.3 percent

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c76c116f0be8dc981209a104aca2
Official record: Open source ↗

ProductionHISTORICAL

103,382 tons

Carbon County · 2022

How calculated

Carbon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30009:hay_production:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 103,382 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c4db103c3a5ff0caf82c508ee030
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation22.7 in

How calculated

RED LODGE, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:defb51be587bd5dcac2669af7aa0
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature43.4 °F

How calculated

RED LODGE, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d1244f532fba77df5e5255a25e4d
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance12.1 miles

How calculated

RED LODGE, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Roberts reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5270c341c7a282ddc3cc3b8914c0
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:09a211480379ce89e67f79370ea8
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

70.6 percent

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:07ddeef236645a3283e2eea493d9
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:043f6650f7bece68ef3f2f9a1c0a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8ca00d1b977d03bab53c753d6815
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

54.1 0-100

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8e0553036ecc434500fb1c802d3b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:965bdcbc2615bb2fd4c9017d48b2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

31 weeks

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:55f1b780da341ae071d0d8d49285
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

53.6 0-100

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7952cd7acfc601c47989d77f25bc
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

35.8 0-100

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:31eb3b8e8707730dec2c47973a23
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

54.1 0-100

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:61b1e8e1d63dcc46921d3a1b05b2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

56.1 percent

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:53664469ba9f8727d5b29dd7c1db
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

28.7 percent

Roberts · 2026

How calculated

Roberts · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e93b68b404fa0370edc8b0469765
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

32.4sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Timothy Hay in Boyd, Montana9.4 mi30,669 ac99.5 2. Timothy Hay in Absarokee, Montana18.4 mi28,677 ac94.2 3. Timothy Hay in Joliet, Montana14.1 mi28,552 ac94.1 4. Timothy Hay in Fox, Montana4.1 mi28,275 ac93.9 5. Timothy Hay in Columbus, Montana20.5 mi28,085 ac92.7 6. Timothy Hay in Fishtail, Montana17.4 mi26,814 ac89.7 7. Timothy Hay in Fromberg, Montana14 mi26,022 ac87.9 8. Timothy Hay in Luther, Montana12.1 mi25,724 ac87.3 9. Timothy Hay in Montaqua, Montana17.4 mi25,617 ac86.8 10. Timothy Hay in Bridger, Montana13.3 mi25,079 ac85.7

Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Roberts?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Carbon Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Roberts

Alfalfa Hay in Roberts, MontanaExact-type evidence in this locality Barley Hay in Roberts, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Roberts, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Roberts, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Roberts, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Roberts, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Timothy Hayin Roberts, Montana

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Timothy Hay in Roberts?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Roberts

Methodology & sources

Timothy Hay
in Roberts, Montana