Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Timothy Hay
in Ashland, Montana
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Ashland.
Request Timothy Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Ashland, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,291 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 59th percentile among 4,473 analyzed Montana localities and the 77th percentile nationally. Rosebud County reports 19,054 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Boyd, Montana, 135 miles away with 30,669 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 22.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 59th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
789 ac
10 mi
2,150 ac
25 mi
11,291 ac
50 mi
45,653 ac
100 mi
166,717 ac
150 mi
401,957 ac
250 mi
1,316,390 ac
Within 25 miles11,291mapped acres · 0.898% of radius · 2025
59th percentile among 4,473 analyzed Montana localities · 77th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Ashland · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
50769- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 50769 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a19e0d15a577554b8a6143900d70- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
79.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
71.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
40,724 headRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 40,724 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7a6b3b187483395505346a95356c- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
66,397 headRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 66,397 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6cd9e23c01142b6db4d613809107- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5 headRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 5 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:acf971231f9a2f49594074ae68eb- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,167 headRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,167 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a40d956c44333caa0c11a74496da- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_headRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0464aed0cba771924f6090196661- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) headRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b69d12a55045fb997f0a0429381f- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
54,032 acresRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 54,032 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:afaa71538db44e521a3c1e13d360- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
164 farmsRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 164 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ce78cc501a04efc8c346662f87f9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
18,194 acresRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 18,194 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b0cc0f9d5bcd52074ce7e496f5e3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
88 farmsRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 88 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:76d9da5f77dc16649bed6080e739- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
33.7 percentRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ecda35f588067adfac5ff69c735f- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
101,039 tonsRosebud County · 2022
How calculated
Rosebud County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30087:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 101,039 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0ed68d72a902ce8c7322deae70b4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Timothy benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation15.5 in
How calculated
BRANDENBERG, MT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a02509a234010e050f7ece3fb202- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature46.6 °F
How calculated
BRANDENBERG, MT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ffdec4da0ca7278860c54e2a0ac0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance15.4 miles
How calculated
BRANDENBERG, MT US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Ashland reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c108337f8859c4a609681a76f21a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
96.8 percentAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:82f4dbb1eb4a44507485bd086d01- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
22.7 percentAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ab1f3b30dc86ad682765904bed86- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4d7b405a79a6663abe03f03c57ba- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 categoryAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:574c213cfbf91498585a433aa7b8- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
43.9 0-100Ashland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:45011b9388b3c0a40c82140e0cb9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE categoryAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:79c7d7175773be078026aac7e697- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
27 weeksAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:cb3c321f3580bcd408110364918d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
43.9 0-100Ashland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:42f6cedc1af5f63b1e4382e47c94- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
31.6 0-100Ashland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:845365fb3604ff903a5032d3a3e3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
43 0-100Ashland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:794e37f2681e316e0b32003131d4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
43.2 percentAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:93cccb8f0a7ef97c4f465986918a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
4.4 percentAshland · 2026
How calculated
Ashland · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:59ddd127737b2c2f21dc0e6d8233- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
54.2sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Boyd, Montana134.5 mi30,669 ac93.32. Timothy Hay in Joliet, Montana129.7 mi28,552 ac88.33. Timothy Hay in Fromberg, Montana126.9 mi26,022 ac82.34. Timothy Hay in Buffalo, South Dakota133.2 mi26,143 ac82.35. Timothy Hay in Marmarth, North Dakota123.5 mi25,814 ac826. Timothy Hay in Montaqua, Montana126.5 mi25,617 ac81.37. Timothy Hay in Rhame, North Dakota134.4 mi25,242 ac808. Timothy Hay in Bridger, Montana128.7 mi25,079 ac79.99. Timothy Hay in Camp Crook, South Dakota112.4 mi24,401 ac79.110. Timothy Hay in Flat Willow Colony, Montana130.6 mi24,516 ac78.4Source hay
Need Timothy Hay in Ashland?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Ashland
Alfalfa Hay in Ashland, MontanaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Ashland, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Ashland, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Ashland, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Ashland, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Ashland, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.