Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Depauw, Indiana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Depauw.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint7,519.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth77.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence79.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty41.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal51 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Depauw, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,520 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 70th percentile among 8,766 analyzed Indiana localities and the 59th percentile nationally. Harrison County reports 11,405 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Leopold, Indiana, 25 miles away with 12,853 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 70th percentile among analyzed Indiana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

79.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 18,770 acres · 97th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2009: 15,555 acres · 97th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2010: 9,911 acres · 95th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2011: 0 acres · 69th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 8,619 acres · 95th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2013: 9,816 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2014: 8,186 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 46th national percentile2015: 11,973 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 57th national percentile2016: 14,210 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 60th national percentile2017: 14,095 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 55th national percentile2018: 17,492 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 55th national percentile2019: 23,315 acres · 94th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2020: 20,443 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2021: 13,554 acres · 94th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2022: 10,694 acres · 94th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2023: 13,357 acres · 94th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2024: 2,382 acres · 100th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2025: 7,520 acres · 70th regional percentile · 59th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

77.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,984 head

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,984 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34feeed679b713bd841982de2743
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
16,417 head

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,417 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cbd1e76b9f33b75217b8388e1f15
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
364 head

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
364 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4025847add781b938cf5c055b30b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
681 head

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
681 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f0dd8b93267032addd139ac1a28d
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4e5510f1ae1d548330e90983143f
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
904 head

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
904 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:96c3816400d4c03e3d7255e2d448
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
14,268 acres

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,268 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c421e883c6eaf52b6bcd3a47d753
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
402 farms

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
402 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a4fc25feeaebba635cce7f967383
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
106 acres

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
106 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ded27536c7e8a2fae016c37601bc
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
14 farms

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4f1e0c1a7691bab383603c60807b
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed1af493789667dcd03be80df7c6
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
31,718 tons

Harrison County · 2022

How calculated

Harrison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18061:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
31,718 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:85e2d5af0290844d60a4ed4b72d1
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation51 in
How calculated

ENGLISH, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9fb2cad4388164126285eaa7307d
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature56.3 °F
How calculated

ENGLISH, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:918889ef5557598510cf30b466b1
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance13.9 miles
How calculated

ENGLISH, IN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Depauw reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:76b981577a4544cd9d9841fb17c7
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:974a19a0b6dbe6febe7d1059c3f2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9ead58522bb1f5c546405fe14c7c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fb29a481eef2f524c4b543b87f78
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bcaf65119d7b476d353c65ffc2c1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1d1880fc6c25f8f3c4fd53b82783
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb61a57bec42de5638860ffc7245
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bb4ed715e27a7f430fe0f4cbb1e4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:084eb0c4f482015142b3ac3baf8f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
13.1 0-100

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:43734eec66b6badb99b04ae16fd1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:003a689998e414f5a60c00220ea2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
3 percent

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b32eeb5dc119ce3a7ec2f4f8a5e9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Depauw · 2026

How calculated

Depauw · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9181b697e40dfe9b28e8213e34f5
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

41.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Depauw?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.