HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Clayton, Idaho

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Clayton.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint3,348.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth42.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty66.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal6.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near Clayton
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Clayton, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 3,348 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 15th percentile among 2,124 analyzed Idaho localities and the 30th percentile nationally. Custer County reports 4,104 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Glen, Montana, 118 miles away with 20,734 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 1.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 15th percentile among analyzed Idaho localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles3,348mapped acres · 0.266% of radius · 2025

15th percentile among 2,124 analyzed Idaho localities · 30th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Clayton · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
15056
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15056 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eb5fe7691505823dad12c1546a15
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 160 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2009: 767 acres · 10th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2010: 256 acres · 5th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2011: 66,738 acres · 99th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2012: 568 acres · 6th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2013: 396 acres · 7th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2014: 981 acres · 9th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2015: 160 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 8th national percentile2016: 192 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 8th national percentile2017: 619 acres · 5th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2018: 806 acres · 4th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2019: 422 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 8th national percentile2020: 784 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 10th national percentile2021: 785 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2022: 1,054 acres · 4th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2023: 1,060 acres · 4th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2024: 587 acres · 16th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2025: 3,348 acres · 15th regional percentile · 30th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

42.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
15,917 head

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,917 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:15680cee9b05e368a69dcfab8ef3
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
22,433 head

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
22,433 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29609f1c36a875e32dc5a2494602
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
11 head

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:08ccce43ef0d4b679efa0d981896
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,125 head

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,125 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e848666df8a92e169424f995ed3c
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8bac9f67141cfeebee44b648ed1
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
29,055 acres

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,055 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ebca44836474f7ad82f859296b5b
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
135 farms

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
135 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:780c1e10a89347f594fd0427fa17
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
28,485 acres

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,485 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc407cc0bc817aa2c67922c22370
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
135 farms

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
135 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a6a5840dbccd6b30ce85eac0b8a3
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
98 percent

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ec70fadd0dc9d8650f9bab65bda8
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
89,210 tons

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
89,210 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e119e0bbd3c798d02fae8ba07397
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.1 tons/acre

Custer County · 2022

How calculated

Custer County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16037:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:13792dfd82c6b007ab86d264dda1
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation6.9 in
How calculated

CHALLIS AP, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:393b07ffc41fd014f5e76ea35cf2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.4 °F
How calculated

CHALLIS AP, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6589b553659456cf4244d7e58730
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance20 miles
How calculated

CHALLIS AP, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Clayton reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:54489337d2509b25b24225cc78c8
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
38.4 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:de52d1afd27eefff2c8308854546
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
1.1 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5bf07a5686791465f0d11734b668
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2dabd27cb4729b3440575e341eb6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b9c5dfc036fde4db680f9fedf2c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
27.3 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb042765e9d96da452f2271b6d3d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d9d38fdf1b514ad7bc8456e7e3c8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
19 weeks

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:475fa58ca6d678c91800b3c9f07d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.6 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6b25588195ea669ead5111c85819
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
5.5 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4f675ad65c6b308ab7bed43b1003
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
38.5 0-100

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:94a60d86b08e5a2766e69c791e91
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
51.9 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4395d95a5786e73a678499aae3d5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
12.6 percent

Clayton · 2026

How calculated

Clayton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:613231e179857ded463059f021ae
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

66.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in Glen, Montana118.1 mi20,734 ac94.12. Timothy Hay in Groveland, Idaho123.1 mi20,586 ac93.33. Timothy Hay in Moreland, Idaho120.8 mi19,351 ac894. Timothy Hay in Riverside, Idaho121.8 mi19,242 ac88.55. Timothy Hay in Roberts, Idaho118.1 mi18,114 ac84.66. Timothy Hay in Jerome, Idaho106.7 mi17,296 ac82.27. Timothy Hay in Rockford, Idaho118.4 mi17,264 ac81.58. Timothy Hay in Burley, Idaho122.6 mi17,280 ac81.49. Timothy Hay in Heyburn, Idaho121.5 mi17,100 ac80.810. Timothy Hay in New Plymouth, Idaho122.5 mi16,924 ac80.1
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Clayton?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Custer Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Clayton

Alfalfa Hay in Clayton, IdahoExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Clayton, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Clayton, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Clayton, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Clayton, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Clayton, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.