Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Acequia, Idaho

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Acequia.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint12,418.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth70 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence82.4 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty51.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal9.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Acequia, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,418 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 55th percentile among 2,124 analyzed Idaho localities and the 81st percentile nationally. Minidoka County reports 3,199 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Plymouth, Utah, 92 miles away with 27,880 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 55th percentile among analyzed Idaho localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

82.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 1,668 acres · 17th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2009: 1,918 acres · 24th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2010: 2,471 acres · 40th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2011: 3,445 acres · 45th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2012: 5,686 acres · 55th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2013: 7,238 acres · 54th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2014: 5,438 acres · 40th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2015: 7,137 acres · 58th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2016: 4,321 acres · 44th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2017: 4,223 acres · 38th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2018: 5,862 acres · 36th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2019: 8,174 acres · 47th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2020: 9,774 acres · 51st regional percentile · 44th national percentile2021: 5,859 acres · 39th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2022: 4,631 acres · 28th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2023: 5,213 acres · 29th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2024: 2,262 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 79th national percentile2025: 12,418 acres · 56th regional percentile · 81st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

70production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
10,408 head

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,408 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3494f0e5198124d64a003779c17e
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
54,709 head

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
54,709 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6fd4489467a02ee9808f15ce563c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
18,626 head

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,626 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:62a1e43f93ff4eb80162be5adfc4
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
572 head

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
572 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c7972316b4e69cce751aadfa0582
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5c9532c228097e750ed0f4248152
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
373 head

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
373 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05ddef2b4296a50279d02784551b
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
35,409 acres

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35,409 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f028b6c0ac853e6b9a957a6f8cbd
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
220 farms

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
220 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:071a2da98df8f2b8c8169e9aa427
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
35,409 acres

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35,409 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1f6154f121b2602c0929bda45ff5
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
220 farms

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
220 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eda1e229f718b60445b8125bdf6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
100 percent

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6366cfb833b86e9debdc67c00961
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
182,537 tons

Minidoka County · 2022

How calculated

Minidoka County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16067:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
182,537 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2441a7b2474c132c2fe946f0dd1e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation9.8 in
How calculated

MINIDOKA DAM, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:568b40cef5cce3b244bc6f9ecf4b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature48.6 °F
How calculated

MINIDOKA DAM, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:12c5b411a8917f0231ed27b384e0
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.9 miles
How calculated

MINIDOKA DAM, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Acequia reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:946e44371f067842edea4fb98640
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:886d6a225c012b80c4bf2a89e39f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:21bee58d00f9bbfa31b64833cc2a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:73f8224ff4829b29979130f3f97e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:df24be29c0e9dbe21f0e57ddba04
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
80 0-100

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:841caa244ef6be831b653c51b877
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:24a52472d9de430a808f8d07078d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:43546c66e0e75a861de719111b63
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
79.9 0-100

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bada4f278f9ba08c3cec2914d621
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:939dabc07df6e29aca7184a0aa9e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:31a0122dfe8b6a7d11049c2adde2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ac9ce9b4d84ea2d23d21b60e17d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
59.6 percent

Acequia · 2026

How calculated

Acequia · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4cc9dbaa7faa3c4b58c3f20d1e30
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

51.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Acequia?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.