Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Pearson, Georgia

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Pearson.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint19,769.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth88.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence86.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty37.6 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal49.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Pearson, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 19,770 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 86th percentile among 6,084 analyzed Georgia localities and the 93rd percentile nationally. Atkinson County reports 3,073 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Fitzgerald, Georgia, 37 miles away with 36,628 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 86th percentile among analyzed Georgia localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

86.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 29,297 acres · 54th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2009: 16,985 acres · 41st regional percentile · 68th national percentile2010: 11,825 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2011: 10,937 acres · 44th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2012: 13,707 acres · 38th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2013: 21,378 acres · 16th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2014: 25,069 acres · 20th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2015: 23,402 acres · 35th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2016: 21,499 acres · 44th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2017: 28,249 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 69th national percentile2018: 26,025 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2019: 38,222 acres · 46th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2020: 34,812 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 70th national percentile2021: 32,029 acres · 57th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2022: 33,920 acres · 61st regional percentile · 78th national percentile2023: 34,997 acres · 65th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2024: 3,545 acres · 77th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2025: 19,770 acres · 86th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

88.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
5,063 head

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,063 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b2a33ce2245af5f11fce48c11636
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
7,838 head

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,838 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1d8bf9264a2b1d0c6fec39119e11
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:19b873d2ad1ab6820eac864e6ecb
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
164 head

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
164 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed189a0855f2a0faf80fc02f0184
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:10a748d4a5980683291024cd7aeb
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
495 head

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
495 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8c021063dfdb59e834346a9a0fc8
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
3,073 acres

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,073 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:66f7aaad5bea33ac84652ccd76e5
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
60 farms

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
60 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9f930cae381b85b6b0e72aaf3e4e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
378 acres

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
378 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ee013b3a08fbe799ba834e10f94
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farms

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:16390fa46f0ae4735a5f20c69ea3
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
12.3 percent

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:18442ae06eb88912ee89aa2f819e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
9,336 tons

Atkinson County · 2022

How calculated

Atkinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13003:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,336 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:538ee1e2313da714d9733cecde5c
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation49.3 in
How calculated

HOMERVILLE 5 N, GA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c7f9197bf9ba175f68aed61915fd
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature66.2 °F
How calculated

HOMERVILLE 5 N, GA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:749e5bc2b4ec342ec6930bcc2ca8
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15.6 miles
How calculated

HOMERVILLE 5 N, GA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Pearson reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7afea977f101516be3be97e88b44
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
7.3 percent

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:25611af1d80cc51f355c4cfe747a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fff0f008ec01ebb8a9cdc32c4d86
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:618b5b182b8fbec56774213fd891
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d5e743f27de9faa38cfef983aaf6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
21.5 0-100

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6e4c1d296a72ad253407befaf365
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:09836b5237adf0e8adb0126d0f93
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
47 weeks

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bda3b8ab46282ffed330406f7754
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c1a576b3d1b1476fa0197fc3e56f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:46dbb3ba7b9655c26762a3f5d8b8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.2 0-100

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5a731a15a472077b7af55020d3a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
89.4 percent

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:480dde43cdea637d34b8e0bfaf06
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
63.5 percent

Pearson · 2026

How calculated

Pearson · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7e84cb0b92ff518fd2a30fde77ae
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

37.6sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Pearson?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.