Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Peetz, Colorado

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Peetz.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint9,675.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth85.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence84.3 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty43.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal15.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Peetz, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 9,675 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 82nd percentile among 4,338 analyzed Colorado localities and the 71st percentile nationally. Logan County reports 17,892 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Eaton, Colorado, 89 miles away with 25,772 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 10.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 82nd percentile among analyzed Colorado localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

84.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 2,354 acres · 46th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2009: 2,617 acres · 55th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2010: 4,592 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2011: 7,585 acres · 54th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2012: 9,187 acres · 56th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2013: 6,471 acres · 60th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2014: 11,711 acres · 59th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2015: 6,275 acres · 67th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2016: 6,860 acres · 69th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2017: 8,240 acres · 71st regional percentile · 47th national percentile2018: 13,188 acres · 68th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2019: 14,127 acres · 80th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2020: 13,650 acres · 77th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2021: 14,152 acres · 81st regional percentile · 56th national percentile2022: 13,825 acres · 78th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2023: 14,166 acres · 78th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2024: 4,284 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 87th national percentile2025: 9,675 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

85.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
22,068 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
22,068 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:355f3d91245e4c4fdbc62ddcd174
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
224,115 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
224,115 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b7b8630600c3f5f9bca2a512f676
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
20 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0f33012352369b0470ac69dde0a3
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
724 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
724 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ce144dd97fbdea2708c4fff85bc2
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a4428ae2c7da8f98ef2bb24de21c
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
445 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
445 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b6116541cb6b2561b07805a5ece
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
53,110 acres

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
53,110 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:971d00e912a30a30646fd3e1ac14
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
222 farms

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
222 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ab258490a10a5ffa14014d27d282
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
34,641 acres

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
34,641 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:939322dce089702bae06f104a1f8
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
167 farms

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
167 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:736ee44c90e948960d1594180555
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
65.2 percent

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:48ff0b687f7f519c341839618068
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
177,141 tons

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08075:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
177,141 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b9c12186c03a29e5e957128b061
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation15.8 in
How calculated

SIDNEY MUNI AP, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cbdc936561f58d56916142afb86c
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature48.5 °F
How calculated

SIDNEY MUNI AP, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b7cc2d3843d07a5a139600ac163d
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.8 miles
How calculated

SIDNEY MUNI AP, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Peetz reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:32284a16fe3911d7beee2082e20e
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
43.1 percent

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eeb3c3bac3344c1d6dd569c3995a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
10.7 percent

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8b2fc6a29ee213a1c3c45667fb80
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3362339c0a3aac6a75590705ed34
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93fc7b701a6d27b7bce6cdb4724c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
28 0-100

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0f2a2f634c86f31285c8f39bb8bc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fe3a0f052eaf87df3a7078c03b0b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
34 weeks

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:96766d3c23f59bc670099d2e1926
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.1 0-100

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:833dbb62d88a0662e8d5ca6bf647
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.2 0-100

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4acde2455327db9423361619f426
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.4 0-100

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ff71ed81e94d8ae1399f08d21168
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
61.2 percent

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:19a2cf1eaf66d805ead6c38ab61a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
37.1 percent

Peetz · 2026

How calculated

Peetz · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84395a4941039e40eee24925ede4
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

43.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Peetz?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.