Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Spaulding, California

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Spaulding.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint2,819.7 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth80.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence81.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty41.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal13 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Spaulding, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,820 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 74th percentile among 14,571 analyzed California localities and the 27th percentile nationally. Lassen County reports 18,785 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Lookout, California, 43 miles away with 16,690 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 58.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 74th percentile among analyzed California localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

81.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,794 acres · 80th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2009: 2,707 acres · 71st regional percentile · 37th national percentile2010: 5,881 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 56th national percentile2011: 6,218 acres · 78th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2012: 4,442 acres · 78th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2013: 3,597 acres · 75th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2014: 6,561 acres · 80th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2015: 1,485 acres · 60th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2016: 748 acres · 46th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 2,462 acres · 66th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2018: 5,674 acres · 69th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2019: 2,300 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2020: 3,222 acres · 68th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2021: 1,984 acres · 60th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2022: 3,022 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 28th national percentile2023: 2,892 acres · 61st regional percentile · 28th national percentile2024: 422 acres · 57th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2025: 2,820 acres · 74th regional percentile · 27th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

80.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
24,829 head

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
24,829 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3c899e078079855fbff27c459ffc
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
43,348 head

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,348 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:424b7b4119a8738b33063ec0729c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
33 head

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:82b15ee8579e6012f883b5462208
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,540 head

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,540 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f8d1dce5a48ba14a8c37fb7d081c
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aed933e514e5368c06e69f405a54
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
541 head

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
541 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a2b9637213ff33ca68cb00439677
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
52,470 acres

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
52,470 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f686883f3cc95bfc93bc27346bb
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
126 farms

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
126 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9a0553d0bb1c5084c8e838bb94ad
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
48,405 acres

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
48,405 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a7d751ff88c18cc84b0253ebf836
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
108 farms

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
108 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fbefbfeed549deba26bee022d660
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
92.3 percent

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05b972655586823797ae8a1bd9f4
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
243,866 tons

Lassen County · 2022

How calculated

Lassen County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06035:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
243,866 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a08f7818f8a4e3e612553ae4c0a3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation13 in
How calculated

SUSANVILLE 2SW, CA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:12716cebebe4ff7d4ea43592f0d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.2 °F
How calculated

SUSANVILLE 2SW, CA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e296ddde4bb13b78d67b7c75dd0b
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance17.7 miles
How calculated

SUSANVILLE 2SW, CA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Spaulding reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:adef17530b263a65ad450283cefe
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
58.5 percent

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:30df3a81c12063f3a31e81cda5af
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d0c08f22d4714cc31ad19cdf44e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:66eb6f3484c8deb84b996c63e5a6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:567ea4e33795d62dc3453751555a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
31.7 0-100

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9ee70f16ed7f1df3397d44d9842
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3810a49308db0a479ae31bf51318
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
10 weeks

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4d589ffe510eab5d315f526d53b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
37.7 0-100

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a9d9af1b6316efbb8f2ebefc81f4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:291639d31669b07279e50aa08af9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
26.1 0-100

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ac511818a2511c09873a17ea346
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
24.3 percent

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3cf5315fbff4fde94f68b0eab00e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Spaulding · 2026

How calculated

Spaulding · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5cf3b4ec2bdbf4b314cac75ad6d7
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

41.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Spaulding?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.