HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in St. Paul, Arkansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving St. Paul.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,415.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth36.1 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence50.2 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty62.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal53.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Timothy Hay Quotes Sell Timothy Near St. Paul
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around St. Paul, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,415 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 11th percentile among 5,634 analyzed Arkansas localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Madison County reports 47,744 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as New Blaine, Arkansas, 42 miles away with 5,079 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 35.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 11th percentile among analyzed Arkansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles1,415mapped acres · 0.113% of radius · 2025

11th percentile among 5,634 analyzed Arkansas localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

St. Paul · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
6364
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6364 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8886b0abcc1025dbad9a9521fa11
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

50.2 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 3,890 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 40th national percentile2009: 2,865 acres · 49th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2015: 9,731 acres · 77th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2016: 6,045 acres · 64th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2017: 5,817 acres · 45th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2018: 6,931 acres · 46th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2019: 5,055 acres · 28th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2020: 5,420 acres · 28th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2021: 3,630 acres · 34th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2022: 2,938 acres · 29th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2023: 2,624 acres · 28th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2024: 3 acres · 12th regional percentile · 4th national percentile2025: 1,415 acres · 11th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

36.1production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
33,437 head

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,437 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e7b3e6fbbca27ba108742fcb121f
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
57,392 head

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
57,392 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a38ca68e0282e2fdec15c4c4041c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
537 head

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
537 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9c0b6c5c6135c330c2c90d74efb6
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
948 head

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
948 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9bd0084a7a630dce4e4e1cd8afe9
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1b910bd29324f439a4cf010968c4
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
712 head

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
712 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5e914532209d02eb2f0cc168381c
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
48,049 acres

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
48,049 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee1c8f5155be5056b0d0011465b5
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
597 farms

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
597 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:115a1545bf529467b80c8cd8b5ca
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
268 acres

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
268 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:91de19f4effb4df8720432c35b71
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
6 farms

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4f18922939daa47b7de28ef7fae2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.6 percent

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0854847fe9ba33d767dc2413ed3e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
101,159 tons

Madison County · 2022

How calculated

Madison County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05087:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
101,159 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ae88712dd9546d2493a3c64d8f4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation53.9 in
How calculated

WINSLOW 7NE, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c8836461cc8a3cd8c4b454dc660
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.3 °F
How calculated

WINSLOW 7NE, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9758eab6a399703d064910dea897
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance14.3 miles
How calculated

WINSLOW 7NE, AR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from St. Paul reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7b4b3cd4ec99aa7a7ba4742d6c05
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8ccb80aa060da1b611f83f777133
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
35.3 percent

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1a69e37328d3d90f9a279693cd74
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
1.3 percent

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69167ca14b721f49e3ab8e73e794
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:747a0b06275bc22d2fa4ce54d358
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
47.3 0-100

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7d8e69ab7ff24036179c4051052b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:75d6e47d7c873a7af501cbac2147
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
23 weeks

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6fd808b7178bd9628104a1be9e1c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
25.1 0-100

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d5ff3a77e97ea1fce9d06f1818d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.6 0-100

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb3299d45f33fae0f47eb0ac233f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
11.7 0-100

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9de96b3205810097c5d025c785c8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
48.9 percent

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a5e2e74fb9119de092e22fc569ec
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
10.1 percent

St. Paul · 2026

How calculated

St. Paul · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:28ffb88b69205586bacf44420476
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

62.1sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Timothy Hay in New Blaine, Arkansas41.8 mi5,079 ac97.92. Timothy Hay in Gateway, Arkansas46.7 mi4,786 ac93.33. Timothy Hay in Garfield, Arkansas45 mi4,745 ac92.84. Timothy Hay in London, Arkansas45.3 mi4,702 ac92.25. Timothy Hay in Knoxville, Arkansas38.5 mi4,408 ac88.26. Timothy Hay in Subiaco, Arkansas37.3 mi4,343 ac87.37. Timothy Hay in Scranton, Arkansas34.7 mi4,261 ac86.28. Timothy Hay in Pea Ridge, Arkansas47.2 mi4,268 ac85.79. Timothy Hay in Morrison Bluff, Arkansas33.8 mi4,151 ac84.610. Timothy Hay in Paris, Arkansas37.1 mi4,164 ac84.6
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in St. Paul?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Timothy Hay markets in Madison Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in St. Paul

Alfalfa Hay in St. Paul, ArkansasExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in St. Paul, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in St. Paul, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in St. Paul, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in St. Paul, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in St. Paul, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.