Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Timothy Hay
in Coker, Alabama

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Timothy hay serving Coker.

Request Timothy Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint2,580.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth50.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence82.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty56.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal53.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Coker, but it does not measure how much is specifically Timothy hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,580 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 19th percentile among 5,346 analyzed Alabama localities and the 25th percentile nationally. Tuscaloosa County reports 5,300 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Marion, Alabama, 47 miles away with 9,205 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 19th percentile among analyzed Alabama localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Timothy hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

82.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 8,652 acres · 16th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2009: 12,381 acres · 34th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2010: 10,184 acres · 12th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2011: 5,250 acres · 21st regional percentile · 55th national percentile2012: 12,167 acres · 29th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2013: 4,177 acres · 16th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2014: 9,518 acres · 21st regional percentile · 49th national percentile2015: 7,392 acres · 15th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2016: 5,346 acres · 14th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2017: 8,408 acres · 15th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2018: 9,831 acres · 17th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2019: 15,872 acres · 20th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2020: 18,226 acres · 20th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2021: 10,766 acres · 19th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2022: 8,704 acres · 18th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2023: 7,637 acres · 15th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2024: 23 acres · 17th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2025: 2,580 acres · 19th regional percentile · 25th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

50.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,202 head

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,202 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:85fc9fd538ea618a058b518ef622
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
6,805 head

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,805 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dbc42f0cc94ca989fcb05249db18
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2b599694f1cfae1c687d9b1ae7af
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
435 head

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
435 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d57aee73ae95a82069d2500c2815
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:55fdfdc84813cb4d15d026d97d58
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
319 head

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
319 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:96c79464c951f1b5b0ce61f7f7f9
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
5,465 acres

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,465 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ef42742749357972f2cafd8d74b
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
113 farms

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
113 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc9fad2fd15382160f15bae1130e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2d7a08a6a31a6a485e7b8f40d198
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c6c66042bd4a14c704135c71e7dc
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
17,111 tons

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,111 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f057ed1a4be9e2b3d3dffeef3e8f
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.1 tons/acre

Tuscaloosa County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscaloosa County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
01125:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c315ef82a0daf8fdbc80ab51744f
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Timothy benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation53.5 in
How calculated

TUSCALOOSA MUNI AP, AL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e07cae859f354d740697ffa524b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature64.5 °F
How calculated

TUSCALOOSA MUNI AP, AL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9370e351565dbad16681ce1ac892
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.4 miles
How calculated

TUSCALOOSA MUNI AP, AL US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Coker reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8ec42ec42558b0d324f9c5b960ec
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
12.8 percent

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c6556dc462f8166e1f4c7620715b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:829a7fcaa831af42a2188726040b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f547740520c292da52bb4bdbbb24
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:41e85a5ea1e6494f050e246f36bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
20.1 0-100

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d7a79cc19c0fb18e4caac9dbdcc9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d47d4cae896f7d6a373fcd39205d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
18 weeks

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:315905be88eb3a48fe994df9d223
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
12 0-100

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f8565a9d4f31d42fcd65f4f7f275
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
29 0-100

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:50c9daec28bfe12696177b1564a6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c3c7a42d72528a0bf44e01e27cf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
45.2 percent

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:da6f1b7d8ede21ba4503568dfcd1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
17 percent

Coker · 2026

How calculated

Coker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98238cf815a41037c47a157dd07c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Timothy Hay in Coker?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Timothy Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Timothy Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.