Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Shiloh, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Shiloh.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint27,271.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth92.3 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence76.3 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty33.9 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal52.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Shiloh, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 27,272 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 99th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 98th percentile nationally. Sumter County reports 3,424 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mayesville, South Carolina, 11 miles away with 29,442 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 9% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 99th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

76.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 15,048 acres · 46th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2009: 11,193 acres · 55th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2010: 13,526 acres · 44th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 15,164 acres · 47th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2013: 16,041 acres · 48th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2014: 16,876 acres · 51st regional percentile · 61st national percentile2015: 10,326 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 54th national percentile2016: 12,044 acres · 37th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2017: 27,124 acres · 65th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2018: 28,595 acres · 64th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2019: 33,730 acres · 59th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2020: 37,614 acres · 61st regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2021: 35,851 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 80th national percentile2022: 38,289 acres · 89th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2023: 41,515 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 84th national percentile2024: 3,797 acres · 89th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2025: 27,272 acres · 99th regional percentile · 98th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

92.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6eb423ee865eea590a79baf36f1a
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
6,266 head

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,266 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8c454092858ff4fbc088a8709cc1
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7063b0a8f907b94f14a43c893f11
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
428 head

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
428 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9c558e88a98bc207e287f83eaae0
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dccd337c349aad791c23875bdce3
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
343 head

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
343 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:41a3049b73adc60780ce33566712
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
3,520 acres

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,520 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fcd746be21d4f555192d193da3de
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
83 farms

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
83 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:675cde9bfaac142b3545c40b60ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
324 acres

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
324 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b115d50a1bd7b1ed500e9125017d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
8 farms

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:126b97a91e3f8f56aa728309c9f1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
9.2 percent

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:75964134e066087150818ef93b5e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
8,820 tons

Sumter County · 2022

How calculated

Sumter County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45085:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,820 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa1efa73c5c2048c005780277a6e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation52.5 in
How calculated

CADES 4 W, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4938e48795ea01f0029891a1c5d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature64.1 °F
How calculated

CADES 4 W, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:223141f39a23e95584b675111241
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance13.4 miles
How calculated

CADES 4 W, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Shiloh reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:50635fceb037f2bc3abdd671b724
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
63.4 percent

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3e29f953a2fc8933dc47b9d7f37a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
9 percent

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cd6b558c19abbf6bad4a796a0913
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:49f24f8946f9367cb948ca5c78ab
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ad99452d0ae2c834bade3647727f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
34.5 0-100

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1739afc1f03ef6e3296dec08b3c3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4c85516c00b2d38e942f5373de5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
23 weeks

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:41f6f9c8050ae03979ec39547354
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3cea5296ff9cd9933b467442f28d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
29.9 0-100

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f5558a70dd9938b9fb7bb64179f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.6 0-100

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:15ec14700ddc8774b2900d0f4c57
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
56.9 percent

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9acecc06ef304a2391ea09ab9052
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
27.9 percent

Shiloh · 2026

How calculated

Shiloh · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fb60c814c95bf5f558106538db49
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

33.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Shiloh?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.