HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Engelhard, North Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Engelhard.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint287.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth34.5 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence61.4 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty65.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal55.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Teff Hay Quotes Sell Teff Near Engelhard
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Engelhard, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 287 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 2nd percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities and the 8th percentile nationally. Hyde County reports 155 head of beef cattle in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Greenville, North Carolina, 77 miles away with 20,156 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 2nd percentile among analyzed North Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles287mapped acres · 0.023% of radius · 2025

2th percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities · 8th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Engelhard · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1291
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1291 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f1dd7bbc584eae91b35a85d6cdb5
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

61.4 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 1 acres · 1st regional percentile · 2nd national percentile2009: 0 acres · 1st regional percentile · 1st national percentile2010: 0 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 2 acres · 1st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 114 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2013: 269 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 14th national percentile2014: 50 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2015: 36 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2016: 28 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2017: 40 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2018: 26 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 2nd national percentile2019: 19 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 3rd national percentile2020: 31 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 3rd national percentile2021: 22 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 3rd national percentile2022: 27 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 2nd national percentile2023: 13 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 2nd national percentile2024: 91 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 29th national percentile2025: 287 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 8th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

34.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
155 head

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
155 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6dab564aaf51bc071f37b8f2b6b5
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
251 head

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
251 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6e312e42ac1a562e42b989fc96cc
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:76b1d6ea51f3bf33572a359351ee
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
(D) head

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:98a24e47de7c7c2b8e53ce88ddb5
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:53b221d327b640b982df82511cc8
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:933ea5fb8797f8e1a08e11bc397c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b19e8cc84a776203f58df188d999
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:74023925c3aeb7a2e219ffd7d33c
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
(D) tons

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8cde30132c5077d2f987d888e97a
Official record
Open source ↗
Other Hay AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:other_hay_acres:2022
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b45f511a8f2b9a460be1b4342934
Official record
Open source ↗
Other Hay FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:other_hay_farms:2022
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:85cf0b082fb1dbc628e86a0ed0a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Other Hay Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Hyde County · 2022

How calculated

Hyde County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37095:other_hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fbdf865e323d9c3c65b169195537
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation55.3 in
How calculated

COLUMBIA AG GUM NECK, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae117f8f7a4452c8ed8550cfb95b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature60.8 °F
How calculated

COLUMBIA AG GUM NECK, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cefd9b6332c52617d52e0275c19f
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15.4 miles
How calculated

COLUMBIA AG GUM NECK, NC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Engelhard reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6bfb52951d3a1995c954d299b654
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c525949261a4cb7087c7ab5badd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:134e8ea5b4450c198bca9a0a9113
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:13a57e38b5516fa259812607d1a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a2ebceb779e81b686581073e918a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ae310f5b5829b91bb546d5d9137f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e5eb185830213d811bbe8ab2d724
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeks

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1ce3ec4c479e1e53102c5ee5719e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
47.3 0-100

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:44d26d500e7a1eca33da74c96b28
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b82e267351ad0b2d770aa2789187
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7d7a8f4106215265f7e209454935
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
53.8 percent

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f6a946b2a961ebbf603463c68f7f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
17.3 percent

Engelhard · 2026

How calculated

Engelhard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ec81a7e24182a32e717bc2b002a2
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

65.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Teff Hay in Greenville, North Carolina77 mi20,156 ac96.12. Teff Hay in Simpson, North Carolina71.5 mi17,620 ac873. Teff Hay in South Mills, North Carolina66.6 mi16,742 ac844. Teff Hay in Sunbury, North Carolina73 mi15,980 ac80.85. Teff Hay in Grimesland, North Carolina67 mi15,486 ac79.36. Teff Hay in Vanceboro, North Carolina66.2 mi14,896 ac77.17. Teff Hay in Stokes, North Carolina72 mi14,449 ac75.28. Teff Hay in Moyock, North Carolina69.1 mi13,420 ac71.59. Teff Hay in Gatesville, North Carolina74.8 mi13,463 ac71.410. Teff Hay in Chocowinity, North Carolina61.4 mi12,937 ac70.1
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Engelhard?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Teff Hay markets in Hyde Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Engelhard

Alfalfa Hay in Engelhard, North CarolinaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Engelhard, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Engelhard, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Engelhard, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Engelhard, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Engelhard, North CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 60 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.