Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Epping, New Hampshire

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Epping.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint9,275.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth82.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence85.3 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty38.3 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal46.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Epping, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 9,275 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 76th percentile among 900 analyzed New Hampshire localities and the 69th percentile nationally. Rockingham County reports 2,431 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Alfred, Maine, 36 miles away with 12,467 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 89.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 76th percentile among analyzed New Hampshire localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

85.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 55,011 acres · 80th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2009: 22,168 acres · 70th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2010: 54,690 acres · 77th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2011: 51,785 acres · 84th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2012: 43,852 acres · 81st regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2013: 21,226 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 68th national percentile2014: 50,925 acres · 74th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2015: 38,599 acres · 69th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2016: 34,557 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 79th national percentile2017: 44,774 acres · 71st regional percentile · 80th national percentile2018: 45,893 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 78th national percentile2019: 37,688 acres · 68th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2020: 41,875 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 76th national percentile2021: 29,376 acres · 55th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2022: 29,015 acres · 66th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2023: 29,646 acres · 67th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2024: 158 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 39th national percentile2025: 9,275 acres · 76th regional percentile · 69th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

82.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
459 head

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
459 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac0bfbeacf856df03265623a53e6
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
1,681 head

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,681 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a2d25e3ac4cb51c3c9d8c95ba2d9
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
402 head

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
402 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ea02bfdd2d10e4283318b9efd74
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,530 head

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,530 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37548fb5a90f12af0a675abcea65
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e20268acacf3a6fce4580fe3d3b4
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
271 head

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
271 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3edc673f9fc2b543703e0d4cffb1
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
2,431 acres

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,431 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1be4c325014ddf19c928222b31dc
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
84 farms

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
84 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33c7a5972ae5370b0ab2019d9327
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:46ca909d0910042784b336b0a888
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b7fb511b5c4d94380e4931e7baec
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
3,535 tons

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,535 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3ffcacb80b4ceb13af9cb5bd0963
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.5 tons/acre

Rockingham County · 2022

How calculated

Rockingham County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
33015:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1602590aca1268939c2e8d368f02
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation46.3 in
How calculated

EPPING, NH US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:08ba075493b860d618d510bde57a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.4 °F
How calculated

EPPING, NH US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07382f89d52121529786fbb24bb3
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.8 miles
How calculated

EPPING, NH US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Epping reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d232cf129d4baca05510b88ebdab
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
89.6 percent

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d488c4758a6189eaa6368a7940c9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:641a6c191e6d3ffa05c0c0ebb6b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f8e082ab2ab5850409a22608ecb8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:40b2798af227a24a3f575399b843
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
37.9 0-100

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1402e8162b0b9524852c9a1514cb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2851150cb082431f2dbcf3a60008
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:75264f2d8097c75488bbaf272802
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:82cd3a14823317783df4fb267783
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
35.8 0-100

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0c22f679e70925cab9d38baea6f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
57.8 0-100

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:267b13a572dcce7c17a4f4cb1477
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
80.9 percent

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b8d0d8647e5aad66dcd626e171d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
28.6 percent

Epping · 2026

How calculated

Epping · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ccba5519ea96b848
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ed97f1a9486be3bac747feb4e06c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

38.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Epping?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 63 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.