Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Rosebud, Missouri

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Rosebud.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint11,508 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth66.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence71.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty48.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Rosebud, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,508 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 55th percentile among 9,729 analyzed Missouri localities and the 78th percentile nationally. Gasconade County reports 25,085 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Hawk Point, Missouri, 43 miles away with 23,754 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 55th percentile among analyzed Missouri localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

71.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 46,248 acres · 56th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2009: 34,548 acres · 56th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2010: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 70th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 30,447 acres · 58th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2013: 31,654 acres · 50th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2014: 36,316 acres · 54th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2015: 36,990 acres · 58th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2016: 48,169 acres · 61st regional percentile · 87th national percentile2017: 60,687 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2018: 62,275 acres · 68th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2019: 76,254 acres · 79th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2020: 85,153 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2021: 60,653 acres · 79th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2022: 54,562 acres · 67th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2023: 40,334 acres · 56th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2024: 41 acres · 15th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2025: 11,508 acres · 55th regional percentile · 78th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

66.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
19,022 head

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,022 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37bf8615af16d53049a97ea9cf74
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
37,564 head

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
37,564 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb6416c30c1cd3b06e10c12270b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
35 head

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c7636a7df350f2ff47ec5264a8ec
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
358 head

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
358 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ac44c80391ff6bf13d0868116a3
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a909955b56f0da019a5fdd91bc1
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
406 head

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
406 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:247ce4aef6678718ed8237a0927b
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
25,628 acres

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25,628 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee147d1dd51cd8da0ea88cbf3b50
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
414 farms

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
414 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:55c85214a03e3e80a144eb4d3b65
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2cbac03ee699d8cf7f927f04f6ca
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:82f3b4b132d420672079c314aaaf
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
45,834 tons

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
45,834 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4d47075b34a05e2b52d9c7442335
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.8 tons/acre

Gasconade County · 2022

How calculated

Gasconade County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29073:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c4dd5aa3912e39f0b0bc332dd6f4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.2 in
How calculated

ROSEBUD, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:987a901a79477655cbe086a83c4f
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature53 °F
How calculated

ROSEBUD, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e92587d0a653970248570db2eff1
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.8 miles
How calculated

ROSEBUD, MO US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rosebud reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:87a298bf74a201b9833eff8dd201
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3b9d47b23c5e533a2e798c5eaaf7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5787b4cd3ff6a70ab86778bcf9f5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:11120f25ed9ba5c2f40d6ff4897d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7ff0ac0d02032459dc0df8c89156
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7981c0c03c096f215126c2462e40
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2c176937e2c18378a1cc9ddb0e9d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
12 weeks

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5e4388cc46eb6a6339bbffb091d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98983bfbd37bbae5c40ddce7941a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
28.2 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c454345df7cc3e336c0bea76903f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0b76018ca0ef86f3a0672677e1a9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
36.4 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8d5fdfc85a59c087de6fc9604f68
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
13 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1bfa2ce1da173e50ca7f660b14cd
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

48.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Rosebud?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.