Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Rockville, Missouri

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Rockville.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint13,671.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth72.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence74 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty45.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal43.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Rockville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 13,671 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 64th percentile among 9,729 analyzed Missouri localities and the 84th percentile nationally. Bates County reports 39,733 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Fontana, Kansas, 48 miles away with 29,248 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 38.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 64th percentile among analyzed Missouri localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

74 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 88,144 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2009: 83,488 acres · 90th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 70th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 73,343 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2013: 68,875 acres · 81st regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2014: 74,831 acres · 86th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2015: 83,757 acres · 96th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2016: 81,364 acres · 85th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2017: 85,380 acres · 87th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2018: 95,464 acres · 89th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2019: 83,743 acres · 86th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2020: 81,531 acres · 79th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2021: 43,272 acres · 61st regional percentile · 85th national percentile2022: 68,807 acres · 84th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2023: 66,325 acres · 86th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2024: 425 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 55th national percentile2025: 13,671 acres · 64th regional percentile · 84th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

72.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
37,467 head

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
37,467 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7d3e1213420bbefe53f692a6e217
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
78,509 head

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
78,509 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:88a3444f87104459ed2d3afc3afc
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
259 head

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
259 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:25c393b157e6604a17d50595fb51
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
996 head

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
996 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2bd730060608e4403d5b6921e10d
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cf0dc84d9a2689bd05fdd73b2f1a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
218 head

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
218 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3c3f679d6faf3618f806cd6975c5
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
41,229 acres

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
41,229 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:97d468e234ae4d67b53ef2fedddb
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
524 farms

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
524 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6bb8ade70645fb56f715440d4bab
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
295 acres

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
295 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd8ab3cf767f7e78197b45708f2c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
13 farms

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3410e809630c0f354b3ed72671d1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:28f0e92d7777bae23f8b62035399
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
78,139 tons

Bates County · 2022

How calculated

Bates County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29013:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
78,139 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e4c8e1e3727965e6be2d738a1a10
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation43.5 in
How calculated

APPLETON CITY, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef39f1ab40701b2ac19a0506c754
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature55.4 °F
How calculated

APPLETON CITY, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c90653db313ab734b0defbadfce9
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.4 miles
How calculated

APPLETON CITY, MO US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rockville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d1e015062d78ffb7c42038763285
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
38.5 percent

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:85a77e5f0bd423ed07553c384599
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d52ca6dc2c0882c1304a23045b2f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2c1d0f5a5b95a9cec8bd8a4d92e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:99e5c02b82b3ce2d6dc725bcad98
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
27.7 0-100

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4d3a92c70035259b707c1155b915
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a5eafa8b3ecb491bc4945fb60672
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
21 weeks

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:62e43f387b15297d0b5819c1aae8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0e029c5feb5519e53d201c837385
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2ab9621919c453b8cebd3593f62a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0dddfa5cae78f1a3480df4f175c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
38.9 percent

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d0f25fc843b69883bb50edf61fd7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
8.4 percent

Rockville · 2026

How calculated

Rockville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b658c2648b794f198af6fd5744fd
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

45.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Rockville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.