Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Taylor, Mississippi

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Taylor.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint5,162.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth78.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence70.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty42.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal60.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Taylor, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,162 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 77th percentile among 3,843 analyzed Mississippi localities and the 43rd percentile nationally. Lafayette County reports 5,347 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as New Houlka, Mississippi, 36 miles away with 12,884 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 30.4% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 77th percentile among analyzed Mississippi localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

70.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 22,867 acres · 76th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2009: 18,051 acres · 77th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2010: 93,174 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2011: 54,870 acres · 80th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2012: 32,107 acres · 77th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2013: 19,605 acres · 76th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2014: 38,799 acres · 78th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2015: 7,574 acres · 71st regional percentile · 49th national percentile2016: 16,221 acres · 81st regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2017: 22,498 acres · 76th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2018: 22,640 acres · 77th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2019: 18,745 acres · 76th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2020: 21,086 acres · 75th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2021: 14,247 acres · 77th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2022: 14,384 acres · 78th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2023: 13,405 acres · 75th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2024: 69 acres · 59th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2025: 5,162 acres · 78th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

78.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,681 head

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,681 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:377c1cea434ceffd2221381c2559
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
7,832 head

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,832 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9809664ace642e9eae7aea898d4d
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9431bcc7064b53dd8c54ec73b3c2
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
270 head

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
270 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b40661ecef3893240ce149f56a4d
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7eba72e9f0a5559edeb008d7d3db
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
173 head

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
173 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a3825e7b00ba2c88d76c39defdc9
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
5,347 acres

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,347 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6faf1975d0081f7cc58e7829c1f9
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
86 farms

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
86 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9f4e01f83c9629449e4f07c29387
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
60 acres

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
60 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9d98c02382ba3e1ca7dbce7e215c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
5 farms

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8e12052c37f34096b51bdef96cc1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.1 percent

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e3cb692e845367e33a8b6556defa
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
6,902 tons

Lafayette County · 2022

How calculated

Lafayette County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28071:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,902 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3d61ba7b58b7823d6845c54ed67
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation60.5 in
How calculated

UNIVERSITY, MS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:608a7bb699efe95cb1af0379490a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature61.9 °F
How calculated

UNIVERSITY, MS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac3cdde51ed3f597a48d46002eb1
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.7 miles
How calculated

UNIVERSITY, MS US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Taylor reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8676880b8e6f96b976228f51cb9
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
30.4 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:480513940a69a56e96c370db017e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ff5dee17f3e49abe82a8d28a85d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:29cf2998d2a396b2c3f9a3e012da
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8bed414ddd71e04f3f8a345b635a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
26.1 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:35bfcc196130c9cbb4348398e88c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:46ab42d05aa1d6fd2493121ddbc2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
21 weeks

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4825d80a254a58acbaa969c5e945
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
17.6 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6a50669dc409cf48eccfa2651fdd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
47.4 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:538bffed15625ecad40fe5d916be
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.5 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a70decbbf7593bf55044cb26df39
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
63.8 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:08b306c0cdb1baed2853e7da9fb4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
24.2 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:accb5d19d135a679fc37dbf58115
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

42.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Taylor?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.