Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Bear Lake, Michigan

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Bear Lake.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint3,700 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth56.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence83.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty53.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal36.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Bear Lake, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 3,700 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 30th percentile among 6,705 analyzed Michigan localities and the 33rd percentile nationally. Kalkaska County reports 470 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Evart, Michigan, 59 miles away with 20,395 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 30th percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

83.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 4,976 acres · 69th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2009: 4,923 acres · 68th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2010: 9,391 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2011: 8,558 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2012: 4,824 acres · 39th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2013: 6,812 acres · 48th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2014: 5,487 acres · 48th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2015: 3,827 acres · 70th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2016: 2,047 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 27th national percentile2017: 3,258 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 31st national percentile2018: 4,337 acres · 47th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2019: 4,053 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 27th national percentile2020: 2,189 acres · 37th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2021: 2,558 acres · 38th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2022: 2,619 acres · 45th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2023: 4,153 acres · 49th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2024: 1,535 acres · 56th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2025: 3,700 acres · 30th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

56.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:634322d877e1e136b553e71d12b2
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
937 head

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
937 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:45fe66bfcf92511e1c321d0232b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:84e6fb1b7cd15a17bdddfdc3e038
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
224 head

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
224 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6f90806857a27d33e94973b78399
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
2.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:62b016a8d9e3ad34e4b97dc6e873
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
177 head

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
177 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:295f75763d5272b734350ad3e744
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
2,841 acres

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,841 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:768fd4e45292b406254a7a11a163
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
63 farms

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
63 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:20938c7c7f3720ac516524618498
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
78 acres

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
78 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cdc93f5c36a164bc1da91d64b026
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc1d4d40dda9f16bf4047595df35
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
2.7 percent

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ec4f2293ab109676085395fe3890
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
3,372 tons

Kalkaska County · 2022

How calculated

Kalkaska County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26079:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,372 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d9ee3c0886cd13118072be741769
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation36.5 in
How calculated

KALKASKA 11SE, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:290b48c7f8683fdb4df762fa77cd
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41.7 °F
How calculated

KALKASKA 11SE, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d9afc9e514daa9dbb01b51ce4b72
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.2 miles
How calculated

KALKASKA 11SE, MI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bear Lake reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a706bd58124f1691fc4c18c1d618
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3304fa1cc24eca845207571d6a34
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:80d0eefe841562e5916b5fa04571
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:494788f3c19fe353f0b15d09a26b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a9207fdde62d4d54fac3f31f6cd8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9df21b517f9875bf376dd5380ddb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b37c8cd5d003ba26dbcc0d18b09f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4a409aa7680bfa69c5a7cb0ca6c4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a6263e686cc7cd64a2bc0ba33418
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a3a713947da7c8a3d722f949902f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bbd6a698e0e23ededadde2e27ad8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
2.9 percent

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:16d218fb7d94fadd11e61ee3ebb6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bear Lake · 2026

How calculated

Bear Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:79bd9c51fff73f5911392568d30e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

53.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Bear Lake?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.