Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Teff Hay
in Ashley, Indiana
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Ashley.
Request Teff Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Ashley, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,758 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 60th percentile among 8,766 analyzed Indiana localities and the 54th percentile nationally. DeKalb County reports 1,093 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Edgerton, Ohio, 17 miles away with 8,499 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 60th percentile among analyzed Indiana localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
414 ac
10 mi
1,606 ac
25 mi
6,758 ac
50 mi
24,201 ac
100 mi
89,834 ac
150 mi
203,351 ac
250 mi
657,326 ac
Within 25 miles6,758mapped acres · 0.538% of radius · 2025
60th percentile among 8,766 analyzed Indiana localities · 54th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Ashley · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
30389- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 30389 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e6bcd56c9395a1ad6cdfed07e176- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
72.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
69.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,047 headDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1,047 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7b5d15d0d98b9e2616de9c676463- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
16,035 headDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 16,035 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d8cc9155ea1468f78c6d92c2bc09- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
2,572 headDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,572 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:68c4d5e37912c23b70b4ab6b97b0- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
747 headDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 747 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4770e7eba8aae6d18ac8554606c0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_headDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b98f9ba903d13d209bf41ff6d28e- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
307 headDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 307 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5e62ec9bd439e9f25ee72905b8f1- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
4,593 acresDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 4,593 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ae7487cbc4cd726fb683f3cd9192- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
225 farmsDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 225 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6322f21fe3d22694befd1cd2d338- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acresDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bf294a43fce87f5efbdb1732d0f1- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farmsDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:329a987db9c917e7df356ca01308- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
11,886 tonsDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 11,886 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6d4be774e3ebcc262d5cc23cb3f2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.6 tons/acreDeKalb County · 2022
How calculated
DeKalb County · county
Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
18033:hay:reported-yield:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- tons/acre
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5665b7b6b38b73c4ef76c080ec6a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Teff benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation38.8 in
How calculated
ANGOLA, IN US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d87619ad13c6fd483322ddfe651d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature48.3 °F
How calculated
ANGOLA, IN US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:026a85b15f708ce0649838386df4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance10.1 miles
How calculated
ANGOLA, IN US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Ashley reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:afb93878bbcd843d015c6cff59b4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c8147fb2b945f9d39deec42f0cea- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9d5a3231db8b73f6749d83d69075- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:55a0018c6f04d02a178f9d01bfd0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE categoryAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:45c23140ac5275c80d3f78c4a8b3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:fc63036d1e9617a60616abb7080c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING categoryAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:57a376ec24b895548f8c8a950429- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeksAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ebafc9bd4cb12829180e476f5c67- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:86510182ac14d56d4fb037b59978- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
38.8 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a6fe3605315adc0d2fba6e290912- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
17.2 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:54a88ed0971aea2a17a37ea7f3df- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
45.2 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7ea3acf66045fbc5a041daa2b055- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
17.2 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:358e687778652d502d6610c29110- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
44.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Teff Hay in Edgerton, Ohio16.9 mi8,499 ac99.22. Teff Hay in Blakeslee, Ohio17.1 mi8,268 ac97.13. Teff Hay in Edon, Ohio15.3 mi8,223 ac96.84. Teff Hay in Butler, Indiana11.8 mi7,942 ac94.55. Teff Hay in Clear Lake, Indiana19.1 mi7,927 ac946. Teff Hay in Nettle Lake, Ohio20.4 mi7,912 ac93.87. Teff Hay in St. Joe, Indiana16.5 mi7,756 ac92.68. Teff Hay in Camden, Michigan22.5 mi7,740 ac92.29. Teff Hay in Montgomery, Michigan21.9 mi7,684 ac91.710. Teff Hay in Lake Seneca, Ohio23.6 mi7,693 ac91.7Source hay
Need Teff Hay in Ashley?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Ashley
Alfalfa Hay in Ashley, IndianaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Ashley, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Ashley, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Ashley, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Ashley, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Ashley, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 84 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.