Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Teff Hay
in Rutledge, Georgia

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Rutledge.

Request Teff Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint12,711 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth73 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty42.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal50.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Rutledge, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,711 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 64th percentile among 6,084 analyzed Georgia localities and the 81st percentile nationally. Morgan County reports 12,519 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Flovilla, Georgia, 31 miles away with 14,427 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 51.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 64th percentile among analyzed Georgia localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

75.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 54,253 acres · 91st regional percentile · 87th national percentile2009: 43,613 acres · 96th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2010: 31,271 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 76th national percentile2011: 27,421 acres · 97th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2012: 25,088 acres · 89th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2013: 144,838 acres · 94th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2014: 143,886 acres · 96th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2015: 51,885 acres · 95th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2016: 53,691 acres · 96th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2017: 63,363 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2018: 57,685 acres · 85th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2019: 69,087 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 90th national percentile2020: 65,523 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2021: 41,711 acres · 67th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2022: 39,245 acres · 67th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2023: 33,406 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 78th national percentile2024: 503 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2025: 12,711 acres · 64th regional percentile · 81st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

73production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,192 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,192 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a4550fa0737450f4bc27c8f23b20
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
19,419 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,419 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c416bad3f07d8ca211f627c0bcf
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
3,775 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,775 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:86254a4b477f869df3325568c2ef
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
749 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
749 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5754f4864cb5ea6e71e5557124c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0a212fdb92b769e06baca1e687d8
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
601 head

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
601 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee62e0a468ea831f7dc5c63bceaf
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
13,359 acres

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,359 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d7f31385bf7e9a4a1a60b9a522fc
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
231 farms

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
231 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0b41d7c6bff1dc39e1f1bb71276c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
70 acres

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
70 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad6f3748e52f0cf54d8df2b25e88
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
6 farms

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:179f0ebe16d5d2c1f35a38f3c0af
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.5 percent

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:059ed9b17ba0dd62e58ed9c82c45
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
30,518 tons

Morgan County · 2022

How calculated

Morgan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13211:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
30,518 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9e380f6cccdc85b547d37a3e55b3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Teff benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation50.5 in
How calculated

COVINGTON, GA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b4a86eb6442872b443d13c3a92f2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature62.1 °F
How calculated

COVINGTON, GA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cefc078c5440a8e8fd362bd58943
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance13.6 miles
How calculated

COVINGTON, GA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rutledge reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3cbe323290163e62376002a7998
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
51.3 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e7ffac558be552f9cb453f289495
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3f0d11ed1f45377727ccec721c80
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5049d29a9929486cda4fa96eb4be
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b9c386ad1c700718f1adb5aafc86
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
30.3 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:92d90ce6a171aa2e719d6977ee6b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e567f58633efaad5b36d7dfacb55
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
35 weeks

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f16a61dbf2962d230d9d0b4806a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2bf677870e8c2657541f484f9038
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
57.2 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e5658ea4306dcb8271a6b9a17f5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:34b9f3c2325d9dd322a1929dd1c9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
64.7 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:939d52483532fcc7f6b0b7929ba7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
33.5 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a5c68af3372a65f2fad6b3fb2dd5
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

42.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Teff Hay in Rutledge?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Teff Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.