Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Teff Hay
in Scott, Arkansas
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Scott.
Request Teff Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Scott, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 489 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 0th percentile among 5,634 analyzed Arkansas localities and the 10th percentile nationally. Lonoke County reports 19,018 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Georgetown, Arkansas, 47 miles away with 9,243 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 0th percentile among analyzed Arkansas localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
40 ac
10 mi
131 ac
25 mi
489 ac
50 mi
12,725 ac
100 mi
63,238 ac
150 mi
132,225 ac
250 mi
427,275 ac
Within 25 miles489mapped acres · 0.039% of radius · 2025
0th percentile among 5,634 analyzed Arkansas localities · 10th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Scott · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
2197- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2197 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:be2ee2fdcb640fe5ef3abd73aa5b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
46.9 / 100 persistence · MODERATE
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
29.1production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,664 headLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 7,664 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:728bb2851da97da7dab10373e8c3- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
14,267 headLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 14,267 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9f7013f318780c174cbac154529b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- headLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- - head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:74823e9b9ad151c6e60ff378ee12- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
566 headLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 566 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:87c1ca5f955297f63d7630df2ec9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_headLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8aae51b2b85b8e34ffad22add13f- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
466 headLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 466 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:05c21f9e046c2c20d8403db388c6- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
19,018 acresLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 19,018 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e5f8f871070f153ca6170ad6ddab- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
202 farmsLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 202 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:49cfcc575fe58e519bacf4c9c283- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,095 acresLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1,095 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f3c3432868a658c42842c160c494- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farmsLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 9 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:37705e440ab4ee013a50dab61b00- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
5.8 percentLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c17473aacfe1a945d6f762bfc80c- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
31,966 tonsLonoke County · 2022
How calculated
Lonoke County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
05085:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 31,966 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:de36a13150e70023d5028341d9eb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Teff benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation50.4 in
How calculated
LITTLE ROCK AP ADAMS FLD, AR US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4908bf6ecf3791106a6d514f012d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature61.7 °F
How calculated
LITTLE ROCK AP ADAMS FLD, AR US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:eaa538315481ceebfa2a51e33a9e- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance8.5 miles
How calculated
LITTLE ROCK AP ADAMS FLD, AR US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Scott reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ba2fb009d61680a6f6485bdaa50b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1364c2290ae8b17929d29c075521- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percentScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:df4cc193330b8698b4344ace7b0c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
81 percentScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:2cde8cd25ffcb5f061ad3d1f057e- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 categoryScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7e3b7b1961f56bdf692c8f5ee7a6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
76.2 0-100Scott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1de51f4408ce265c0ddcaf7f7c31- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:132ec04b35a1317a55d3680cb208- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeksScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f5d33002cab72ece50b458e43f08- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
64.8 0-100Scott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f5cd2571c106a2561c0652164a42- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
56 0-100Scott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:da61fb65318d965307ca96a482e7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.2 0-100Scott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:3cd164210786ed19fa989cf5c50f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
96.4 percentScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5c6b178c17a7ef8ebdcdfa840ce3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
53.7 percentScott · 2026
How calculated
Scott · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:934b0f3ab44e830eb63d7f4e5ba9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
65.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Teff Hay in Georgetown, Arkansas46.8 mi9,243 ac97.72. Teff Hay in Des Arc, Arkansas38.5 mi7,427 ac83.33. Teff Hay in West Point, Arkansas44.4 mi7,463 ac83.34. Teff Hay in Griffithville, Arkansas38.9 mi7,286 ac82.25. Teff Hay in Judsonia, Arkansas47.5 mi7,098 ac80.26. Teff Hay in Kensett, Arkansas44.2 mi6,448 ac75.17. Teff Hay in Higginson, Arkansas40.6 mi6,208 ac73.38. Teff Hay in Searcy, Arkansas42.7 mi5,920 ac70.99. Teff Hay in Garner, Arkansas35.5 mi5,858 ac70.810. Teff Hay in Clarendon, Arkansas44.7 mi5,716 ac69.1Source hay
Need Teff Hay in Scott?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Scott
Alfalfa Hay in Scott, ArkansasExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Scott, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Scott, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Scott, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Scott, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Scott, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 85 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.