Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Teff Hay
in Notasulga, Alabama
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Teff hay serving Notasulga.
Request Teff Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Notasulga, but it does not measure how much is specifically Teff hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,702 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 53rd percentile among 5,346 analyzed Alabama localities and the 60th percentile nationally. Macon County reports 8,029 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Louisville, Alabama, 54 miles away with 16,190 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 53rd percentile among analyzed Alabama localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Teff hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
418 ac
10 mi
1,295 ac
25 mi
7,702 ac
50 mi
34,147 ac
100 mi
168,538 ac
150 mi
369,910 ac
250 mi
793,370 ac
Within 25 miles7,702mapped acres · 0.613% of radius · 2025
53th percentile among 5,346 analyzed Alabama localities · 60th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Notasulga · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
34630- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 34630 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b95d9609d7ff0a35f8fa01b1e7fb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
85 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
69.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) headMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7b062e92bebb5e4d9f43982facfe- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
8,334 headMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 8,334 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:10b622440ff1d7cc13029da6b95b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) headMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:76e35732550df99aeddf41507494- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
417 headMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 417 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:457dcd8f955be7acc7c953051057- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_headMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:118b0c0fcff0daf85d4b44ccbe67- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) headMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8b035894a5a549a18f71051f4479- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
8,109 acresMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 8,109 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bd9f9ea56d2854523ec03a126890- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
101 farmsMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 101 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c832dba309740875f644917ed0cf- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
120 acresMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 120 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5feb68657bd630d0e9d6ae27a3b7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farmsMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 3 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:237e4a5b884857213e574b3540ac- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.5 percentMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e87d742370f0375b9c42eb3c8fe5- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
16,639 tonsMacon County · 2022
How calculated
Macon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
01087:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 16,639 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:29ee5acad09d8ec004abbce0ceec- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Teff benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation56.5 in
How calculated
AUBURN NO.2, AL US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:759e1ba2f2ffe769a3a8e8a3fa51- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature63.6 °F
How calculated
AUBURN NO.2, AL US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7102bfdb80024d1f0ed8b82f928a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance12.2 miles
How calculated
AUBURN NO.2, AL US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Notasulga reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:dbbfde71fddfbc47cb177ccfccb5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percentNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:171d6443a2f265eaf2ac8dc08faf- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e9e2fb0fbb2ac3b0ff3b972c15a8- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:60d3c59b927268ab651e5d6e12f4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 categoryNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1c36094b462ce4bcff3ea8abc3af- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
20 0-100Notasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1b33a7514329394d0beb85069408- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4682b00c355b4dbd041880bb1abf- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
35 weeksNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9cf54820e3da5cc882e6f034cdd6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100Notasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:15e8d56819baba032be86c6d1471- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100Notasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b617f441b64bbd8b77c58f472ffd- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Notasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:484febe0e229c8cb9d12cf3f4055- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
66 percentNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:060ed356f29c4a0a651a422cd659- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
58.2 percentNotasulga · 2026
How calculated
Notasulga · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:e807dfbdc4c96089- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:30eefff2dd4f00b76047f1a7a18d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
45.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Teff Hay in Louisville, Alabama53.9 mi16,190 ac97.32. Teff Hay in Brundidge, Alabama58.5 mi15,871 ac95.63. Teff Hay in Clio, Alabama58.6 mi15,811 ac95.34. Teff Hay in Bakerhill, Alabama58 mi15,737 ac955. Teff Hay in Clayton, Alabama48.1 mi15,364 ac93.86. Teff Hay in Banks, Alabama52.2 mi15,191 ac92.87. Teff Hay in Troy, Alabama54.9 mi14,105 ac87.68. Teff Hay in Cusseta-Chattahoochee County unified government, Georgia53.3 mi13,799 ac86.39. Teff Hay in Hurtsboro, Alabama26.3 mi12,755 ac82.810. Teff Hay in Opelika, Alabama18.4 mi12,200 ac80.6Source hay
Need Teff Hay in Notasulga?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Notasulga
Alfalfa Hay in Notasulga, AlabamaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Notasulga, AlabamaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Notasulga, AlabamaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Notasulga, AlabamaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Notasulga, AlabamaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Notasulga, AlabamaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Teff Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 87 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.