HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Taylor, Wyoming

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Taylor.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth52.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence28.9 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty56.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal11.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Taylor
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Taylor, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 53rd percentile among 205 analyzed Wyoming localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Lincoln County reports 36,441 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Portage, Utah, 65 miles away with 3,718 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 42.4% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 53rd percentile among analyzed Wyoming localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

53th percentile among 205 analyzed Wyoming localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Taylor · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc0d9c0ea045429614d0db3c489f
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

28.9 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 0 acres · 66th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 34th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 26th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 38th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 60th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 16th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 47th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 58th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 44th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 18th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 46th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2019: 1 acres · 38th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2020: 2 acres · 30th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2021: 4 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 21st national percentile2022: 2 acres · 19th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2023: 2 acres · 26th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2024: 1 acres · 59th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

52.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb0b0143f22e2b8606feb29fe750
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
36,829 head

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,829 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:684593673dc8fb775c6626191a44
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f09e43ccf8b8c8a9a0c991f074d3
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,648 head

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,648 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4a19349342f7010d104530eacd25
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:efde5f77fa8e04ea4f995910abff
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
154 head

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
154 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5019c873da5a8da03128399c938a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
63,204 acres

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
63,204 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65375bbeaf96540f5173307b6f8a
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
360 farms

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
360 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ba207d3040a48f51d5f3653c2505
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
52,308 acres

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
52,308 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c766e2fe75cc33ca7953332d2f69
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
274 farms

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
274 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7653be320ae6c17ef0aac6f10c66
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
82.8 percent

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dab1b29b5e5eff12864c843c6db0
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
130,132 tons

Lincoln County · 2022

How calculated

Lincoln County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56023:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
130,132 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d2eb3b638359b3c77f6e309faf9d
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation11.3 in
How calculated

LIFTON PUMPING STN, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:511487020ee5bc242858a7cc0818
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41 °F
How calculated

LIFTON PUMPING STN, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d9b49c2d73506ac78bbc0c4df9d0
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance17.2 miles
How calculated

LIFTON PUMPING STN, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Taylor reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f4b3c608d5bb9f7147f6d3cd586c
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:51cfdad9601efdcfae4ab8ebbba8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
42.4 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e1b63e87fe503ac8901c7ac78230
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
2.3 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93bb84d562ddd5f8b2eff2cb8aad
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:570af2398b2daff8b1abadc9986f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
48.9 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:73f1c68fefcd2327c81d75c3e788
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac393dd44d92cf4a6e9c5b9b1e8a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:280403da64663a7fb3883fed08bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
57.3 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:651e0be40c05bd11cd0012bb2969
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
35.9 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:da61bd49a412509ce798b56017a1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
56.6 0-100

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4c83067155481abf042e7ad1b861
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
89.4 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:70c499952b1c3da17708ba92ca1b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
60.5 percent

Taylor · 2026

How calculated

Taylor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:689bb5c03945fb5e5ba875a56c15
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.3sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Portage, Utah64.7 mi3,718 ac96.82. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Plymouth, Utah61.1 mi3,646 ac95.53. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Newton, Utah53.6 mi3,465 ac92.24. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Clarkston, Utah55.6 mi3,390 ac90.65. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Cache, Utah55 mi3,331 ac89.56. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Weston, Idaho50.9 mi3,308 ac89.27. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Riverside, Utah61.9 mi3,283 ac88.18. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Fielding, Utah60.8 mi3,258 ac87.79. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Dayton, Idaho51.3 mi3,073 ac84.410. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Peter, Utah55.9 mi3,050 ac83.7
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Taylor?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Lincoln Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Taylor

Alfalfa Hay in Taylor, WyomingExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Taylor, WyomingContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Taylor, WyomingContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Taylor, WyomingContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Taylor, WyomingContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Taylor, WyomingContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.