HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Rib Lake, Wisconsin

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Rib Lake.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint266.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth42.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty58.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal34.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Rib Lake
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Rib Lake, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 266 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 15th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 43rd percentile nationally. Taylor County reports 18,293 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Stratford, Wisconsin, 37 miles away with 2,006 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 15th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles266mapped acres · 0.021% of radius · 2025

15th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 43th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Rib Lake · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1197
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1197 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8b018f1d9c1e115182033d1e4846
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 4 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 35th national percentile2009: 42 acres · 81st regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2010: 2 acres · 15th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2011: 143 acres · 97th regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2012: 14 acres · 67th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2013: 176 acres · 75th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2014: 7 acres · 10th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2015: 3 acres · 15th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2016: 4 acres · 25th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2017: 31 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2018: 21 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 41st national percentile2019: 299 acres · 67th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2020: 242 acres · 51st regional percentile · 64th national percentile2021: 21 acres · 11th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2022: 368 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 74th national percentile2023: 37 acres · 27th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2024: 84 acres · 21st regional percentile · 45th national percentile2025: 266 acres · 15th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

42.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
5,077 head

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,077 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a1fa2569e3c2806b9882e38d4fd9
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
39,963 head

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
39,963 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f958783358ec7d9f237c3b2b653d
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
16,174 head

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,174 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5e6effb13b93cf37bb130890f0b9
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
877 head

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
877 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b25557a1b70f02fc644c3d756d01
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:489cdb0d93a52325db76e2412cf8
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
319 head

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
319 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4932d15849dc1b47b05779efa28d
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
32,004 acres

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
32,004 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:937310c0d4d9b5d570b00a8d66f1
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
434 farms

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
434 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:780af540af7fe60a4abfafb433b1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
60 acres

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
60 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34c0d2393b898f3eccd293930384
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:888a71ed32b98b86c1f965260eeb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.2 percent

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5f817027917633f401b280f38b9c
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
80,555 tons

Taylor County · 2022

How calculated

Taylor County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55119:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
80,555 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4c85c25c02621cbb92212225f92c
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation34.2 in
How calculated

MEDFORD, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8aa73503e3d1e01b8cfe735fa24
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41.8 °F
How calculated

MEDFORD, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1b7d0f66a773a8ab6865658bde18
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance14.7 miles
How calculated

MEDFORD, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rib Lake reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f6f88f4c610a64ab414ed8b6d598
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b0ac22c5f7291f2dfd1e626e0aed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:abc9efd25bf550d5c6a9f5c4d279
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f08d450e6f40e416a6b1edca74ea
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1de4c0d23e3fe908e3441bfbe45c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b88b8097b01d0613cf0dc7d040d9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2868380f4d5085b795b7a73ff30e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
10 weeks

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:282efcedf36d447d4fc0a5d68072
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e50bec9faa23966edd9780206db5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6db962b647cf64c5b71cf0de8bce
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
33 0-100

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b30344bc348e5c741882cf94db4b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
27.8 percent

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2b58135a9afa43706b9f74ba743
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
3.8 percent

Rib Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rib Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a41fd9e24ddf8e341d625a7335ad
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Stratford, Wisconsin36.6 mi2,006 ac98.22. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Spencer, Wisconsin39.4 mi1,999 ac97.83. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Fenwood, Wisconsin32.7 mi1,981 ac97.44. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Unity, Wisconsin32.8 mi1,936 ac95.75. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Marshfield, Wisconsin45.4 mi1,937 ac95.16. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Colby, Wisconsin28.7 mi1,886 ac94.17. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Abbotsford, Wisconsin26.6 mi1,827 ac928. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hewitt, Wisconsin47 mi1,856 ac929. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Edgar, Wisconsin29.8 mi1,775 ac89.910. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Auburndale, Wisconsin48.7 mi1,751 ac88
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Rib Lake?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Taylor Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Rib Lake

Alfalfa Hay in Rib Lake, WisconsinExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Rib Lake, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Rib Lake, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Rib Lake, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Rib Lake, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Rib Lake, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.