HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Tropic, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Tropic.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint0.7 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth39 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence50.6 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty64.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal16.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Tropic
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Tropic, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 16th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 19th percentile nationally. Garfield County reports 1,952 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Ferron, Utah, 113 miles away with 1,520 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 67.2% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 16th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles1mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

16th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities · 19th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Tropic · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
3
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e236c213f16427d430f5ea80b164
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

50.6 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 1 acres · 16th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2010: 7 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 44th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 21st regional percentile · 18th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 19th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 16th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 8th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2015: 8 acres · 27th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2016: 2 acres · 31st regional percentile · 24th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 35th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2018: 2 acres · 10th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2019: 8 acres · 10th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2020: 4 acres · 10th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2021: 5 acres · 8th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2022: 113 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 59th national percentile2023: 19 acres · 20th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2024: 19 acres · 16th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2025: 1 acres · 16th regional percentile · 19th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,942 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,942 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df993a00c4875bd352a4674f7071
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,087 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,087 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4cefcbcfd2341c61103d574ef838
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
3 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a36a2b9394c23438d832af6d8d6c
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,079 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,079 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:615e8a6a3dbb7ca90c3b042250a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e81c8999a3dea46c202a0478976
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
9 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52256061786d2c498bfab088e7a8
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
12,722 acres

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,722 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07bcbef9fac220d93172890a5426
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
155 farms

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
155 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f14599a096d55acfd8db4c35a648
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05a1279d00d05cc25ed89b2ea912
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
153 farms

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
153 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:35e268aa6cfbd6005825f592cbaa
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
43,247 tons

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,247 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:da57103de54bb6f0729e271a5ba6
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.4 tons/acre

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49017:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b6f2c13155b3a56d0a98da594a3f
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation16.7 in
How calculated

BRYCE CANYON NP HQRS, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ef48fd0ed53958f4b904c1f3bfa
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.4 °F
How calculated

BRYCE CANYON NP HQRS, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4933509e1cc735a8366e9b0f32b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.5 miles
How calculated

BRYCE CANYON NP HQRS, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Tropic reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fcd5de6bf38a26c9ca22f54b7664
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:765acd4690f47898f83011102754
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
67.2 percent

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b4ae02f6f95eb4ed2868ce213c14
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fefa57e45cf834b31d01e1514026
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be0adcacb047d981f2b7eb75e9da
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
53.4 0-100

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7a99751d894d2c834af3f5ccb7fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a7ee34af6744096752f32d9b28e2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3b2463b373c1028618d7988c48c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
64 0-100

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1bdf924ccf95b19d62978eb7519f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
45.2 0-100

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7d58c16f9d9689d93a48e9e331b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
53.4 0-100

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d03f05d3c0f3e25b7c6c693be27e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
99 percent

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:575886a02782babe99a19803e6a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
59.1 percent

Tropic · 2026

How calculated

Tropic · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be5ffdbd0678218e6b6c31e666c6
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

64.3sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Ferron, Utah113.3 mi1,520 ac94.32. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Holden, Utah101.8 mi1,344 ac86.23. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Scipio, Utah111.7 mi957 ac66.64. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Fillmore, Utah93 mi864 ac635. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Elsinore, Utah72.7 mi831 ac62.46. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Central Valley, Utah73.7 mi831 ac62.37. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Joseph, Utah68.9 mi817 ac61.98. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Annabella, Utah74.2 mi822 ac61.99. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Monroe, Utah68.4 mi801 ac61.110. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Meadow, Utah88.3 mi790 ac59.6
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Tropic?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Garfield Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Tropic

Alfalfa Hay in Tropic, UtahExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Tropic, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Tropic, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Tropic, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Tropic, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Tropic, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.