HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Rosebud, Texas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Rosebud.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength45/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint15,976.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth79.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty39.9 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal38.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Rosebud
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Rosebud, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 15,977 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 69th percentile among 1,863 analyzed Texas localities and the 96th percentile nationally. Falls County reports 129,740 head of cattle in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Holland, Texas, 28 miles away with 20,895 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 69th percentile among analyzed Texas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles15,977mapped acres · 1.271% of radius · 2025

69th percentile among 1,863 analyzed Texas localities · 96th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Rosebud · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
71839
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
71839 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d8a5775fb29f8e72677f3c00f075
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

87.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 22,881 acres · 57th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2009: 27,509 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2010: 37,947 acres · 76th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2011: 37,258 acres · 85th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2012: 48,538 acres · 80th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2013: 36,662 acres · 76th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2014: 31,074 acres · 74th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2015: 33,926 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2016: 19,886 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2017: 19,766 acres · 71st regional percentile · 97th national percentile2018: 12,904 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 95th national percentile2019: 24,645 acres · 77th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2020: 21,903 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 97th national percentile2021: 28,965 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 97th national percentile2022: 19,489 acres · 69th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2023: 21,710 acres · 67th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2024: 13,015 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2025: 15,977 acres · 69th regional percentile · 96th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

79.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a6e3780f36dfed2534533b436248
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
129,740 head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
129,740 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07e604d95d417a0af7d2d3a74672
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f5ff102fb13c4d117129b031f61
Official record
Open source ↗
SheepHISTORICAL
1,526 head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:sheep:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,526 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e7d0469277b7ff87b0c05d8549b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a6e3780f36dfed2534533b436248
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
129,740 head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
129,740 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07e604d95d417a0af7d2d3a74672
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f5ff102fb13c4d117129b031f61
Official record
Open source ↗
SheepHISTORICAL
1,526 head

Falls County · 2022

How calculated

Falls County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48145:sheep:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,526 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e7d0469277b7ff87b0c05d8549b3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation38.6 in
How calculated

CAMERON, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6717d169cf4de3cae86758ceaed5
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature68 °F
How calculated

CAMERON, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1b0e10411ed94b6a1ad31af5cb5
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15.9 miles
How calculated

CAMERON, TX US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rosebud reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:23fe08c27fe13a2ad1c042c0b808
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf6e2564832b6dedf62ddcf5a55f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:75735b0de58720505360fc77eda2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aed727f50dca98e4cb01cf58a453
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a212717320e508b56c98bd3493a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:946820b0ba02f4f5c92e505daa4a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0cfa4a0afaf66d9be08dadfb50bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
13 weeks

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:65fd60bf7162bbf0ae57b710d16c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:36c95dab69c6a921f8d6cfbaeee9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:11edc13a39972693511f01c8db7f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0.3 0-100

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9eeedf0ee0deca161b2f69390378
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
29.6 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:372cce9c2d1a4cdfb88d3315d5ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
9.1 percent

Rosebud · 2026

How calculated

Rosebud · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:819e781e95e73039fc1eebf497e5
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

39.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Holland, Texas28.4 mi20,895 ac98.22. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Granger, Texas37.1 mi21,013 ac98.13. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Bartlett, Texas33.4 mi20,780 ac97.54. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Little River-Academy, Texas23 mi20,537 ac97.15. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Rogers, Texas18.2 mi20,353 ac96.76. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Thrall, Texas38.8 mi19,342 ac92.17. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Thorndale, Texas34.7 mi19,229 ac91.98. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Buckholts, Texas16.7 mi18,865 ac91.59. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Burlington, Texas5 mi17,458 ac87.110. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Taylor, Texas44.1 mi17,954 ac86.9
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Rosebud?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Falls Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Rosebud

Alfalfa Hay in Rosebud, TexasExact-type evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 49 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.